Domestic and Foreign Policy
This is an excerpt from the paper...
There is a tension evident in the operations of Congress, the presidency, and the bureaucracy in the development of domestic policy and foreign policy between the desire to be seen as promoting representative democracy while at the same time meeting the real need to satisfy the requirements of factions in a pluralist democracy and the demands of powerful elites without appearing to do so to the exclusion of the rights of others. This is a difficult balancing act and prone to produce criticism, and the electoral system by which the President and congress are chosen in particular involves such a need for money that critics can charge that elites and powerful factions have more in-put than they should because they can provide more money. Interestingly, the bureaucracy is seen as unresponsive to most external blandishments and is instead perceived as a monolithic and ongoing institution, inefficient but largely non-partisan. The interplay of factions and elites on the electoral side and stolid The American political system as embodied in the Constitution is supposed to be a democracy with a government that derives entirely from the will of the people. However, there is also considerable influence brought to bear by elites in the form of representatives of corporate wealth that can gain access denied the average citizen, provide funds for candidates and programs, pay lobbyists to push their agenda, and generally manage to have more influence than the average citizen.
. . .
ilures. The prevailing view derives from the latter position, holding that bureaucratic service to clients is terrible. Defenders of the bureaucracy see this view as based on faulty reasoning and offers evidence that it is not an accurate portrayal of the situation.
There are also similar views of the failure of both the presidency and Congress to address issues, respond to constituents, and provide service, and disaffection with government in general has become a major force in American life. It is evident that members of the bureaucracy, members of Congress, and the President all want to appear to be promoting the ideal of a representative democracy. This is the ideal held out in the Constitution and celebrated in American political and social life. At the same time, though, the public perception is that politicians respond better to special interest groups and to powerful elites, and there are good reasons for thinking so. the influence of money on elections is one reason. The bureaucracy is seen as responding to elites as well simply because the perception is that those with money and power have an easier time at all levels. Politicians, including the President and Congress, are seen as responding more directly to
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, DeBow Syer, President People, Congress President, President Congress, Stewart Sunshine, Otherwise Americans, Executive Branch, Harrigan JJ, Sunshine KV, average citizen, president congress, domestic policy, representative democracy, foreign policy, harrigan 1993, executive branch, congress president, schultz stowitts stewart, political actors, foreign issues, protect rights minorities, stowitts stewart sunshine, debow syer 1992,
Approximate Word count = 1801
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Domestic and Foreign Policy
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
