Learning How to Learn
This is an excerpt from the paper...
There is a growing body of literature that makes the case that learning how to learn is every bit as important as the content of instructional material. A significant part of that research also suggests that the key to successful learning resides with enabling the learner to learn and not with enabling the instructor to teach. That creates special challenges for teachers because the teacher is nevertheless intimately involved with the learning process. What is different about current thinking on the subject of learning is that the way teachers and students handle their respective roles can be decisive for whether any learning actually takes place. That is the subject of this research.Many learning theories have emerged over the years, in part as a response to the perception that educational systems have been largely incompetent at educating students. Traditional methods of instruction, which position teachers as expert and authoritarian systems and which emphasize the importance of memorization and rote, were under scrutiny for much of the 20th century. However, actual implementation of innovative practices lagged behind the discourse of learning theory, and even today there persists a view that the problem with failed education lies in the content of the curriculum. Education fails not because students lack academic ability or "willingness to learn but because of inherent shortcomings in curricular organization. A systemic failure to teach all children the knowledge they n
. . .
rk, somewhat revisiting Step 1 for more complex ones (pp. 313-21). The less evidence there is that a problem exists, the closer to a solution the problem is likely to be.
Problem-solving skills are linked to the skills of critical thinking (Orlich, et al., 2001, p. 341). In turn, critical thinking is linked to the development and nurturance of cognitive and analytical skills that are meant to serve the learner not just in school but over the course of a lifetime (Tsui, 2002). Various approaches to facilitating the development of such skills have been the subject of research. While some experts advocate including a separate course in critical thinking in the average school curriculum, it is more usual for critical thinking to be "incorporated into the existing subject matter in different ways" (Wright, 2002, p. 257). That is so in part because cognitive/constructive teaching methodology--emphasizing, as it does, process rather than mere content--anticipates that the structures of thought that learners achieve in one discipline (say, math) will be transferable to other disciplines (say, social studies): That approach means that there is less risk of teaching "inert" knowledge--knowledge that is never applied outside of the subject
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Snowman Biehler, Alt Chapman, Jesus Church, John Dewey, , Catherine Siena, Hirsch Dewey, Idea University, Augustine Paul, Land King, christian education, spiritual growth, snowman biehler, critical thinking, direct instruction, learning strategy, snowman biehler 2003, progressive education, wright 2002, biehler 2003, subject matter, spiritual growth christian, bob jones university, growth christian education, direct instruction highly,
Approximate Word count = 6673
Approximate Pages = 27 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Learning How to Learn
|