Animal Rights

The level of activism and the tactics employed in the pursuit of animal rights in the late1980s, however, do represent changes (Holden, 1989; Zak, 1989). Both sides in the controversy demand moderation in the behavior of the parties in the opposing camp, and each side demands new laws to deal with either the protection of animals, or the protection of those who use (or abuse) animals (Alperson, 1988; Cowley, 1988; Jansy, 1988; Zak, 1989).

This current research examines the concept of animal rights in the context of law and utilitarianism. Specifically, this research attempts to determine what actions a law based upon utilitarian philosophy would deem to be acceptable and unacceptable with respect to the use and treatment of animals. In pursuing this goal, it is necessary to examine (1) utilitarian philosophy, and its relation to law, and (2) the concept of animal rights, before attempting to relate the two. The utilitarian philosophy and its relation

. . .
tion is utilitarian in character, because it holds that the good outweighs the bad. It is an evaluation, however, which presumes that humans have a greater worth than do other animals (McCabe, 1988), although some biomedical researchers emphasize that other animals also benefit from the use of animals in laboratory research (Koshland, 1989). The presumption that other animals lack the same worth as humans began with Aristotle, who held that a lack of rationality makes them by nature slaves to humans (Zak, 1989). Seven hundred years after Aristotle, St. Augustine, in establishing a Christian justification of human domination in the world, argued that Christ taught that (1) to refrain from killing animals is to give in to superstition, and (2) no commonality of rights exist between humans and other animals (Zak, 1989). In the sixteenth century, Rene Descartes added to the philosophical underpinning of the idea that humans had a greater worth than other animals. Descartes developed the doctrine that animals are pure machines, whereas human are machines with minds (Young, 1966). Descartes held that to attribute minds to animals would threaten religious belief, because it would be impious to think that humans have no greater h
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Jeremy Bentham, Science Koshland, Japan World, Cruelty Animals, Rights According, William Sound, United Americans, Rene Descartes, Animals PETA, Philosophy Law, animal rights, utilitarian philosophy, treatment animals, animal rights activists, rights activists, zak 1989, rule utilitarianism, alperson 1988, rights movement, animal rights movement, utilitarianbased law, scientific research, animals scientific research, applicable treatment animals, development utilitarianbased law,
Approximate Word count = 3826
Approximate Pages = 15 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Animal Rights