Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

The Waste Land

This is an excerpt from the paper...

Almost seven decades later, the controversy still rages: Who is the speaker(s) in The Waste Land? Although we now live fully in the modern age for which the poem was written, greater familiarity with modern attitudes have not made the identity of the speaker(s) less confusing. But critical sophistication finally cannot separate its author from the one speaker in The Waste Land.

The Waste Land was written in 1921 and published in 1922, shortly after World War I, an unsettled time in European history. In the poem, the reader is being directly addressed, and because of this the poem continues in the tradition of the dramatic monologue, a genre brought to a 19th century apotheosis by Robert Browning in The Ring and the Book. Other similarities of The Waste Land to the accepted traditions of the genre are harder to come by.

In Browning's dramatic monologues, the speaker is clearly identified, the locale is specified, the time is given, the addressee is understood--all of this information coming either from the title of the poem or unfolded to the reader through the speaker's monologue. The monologue purports to be the actual words of the speaker, and the reader has the experience of becoming acquainted with the speaker through this monologue as though the reader were overhearing a conversation or as if he were the addressee. The reader is aware of the very details of the physical setting, the gestures and activity of the speaker

. . .
nsists on "two quite distinctive protagonists" (34). If we look to Eliot to learn who is speaking, we find that one school of critics distrust Eliot's notes altogether and speak of their "interpretive inadequacy" (Menand 180); Eliot's notes are considered too much a part of the poem to be in any way explanatory. Nevertheless, it is worth our reading what Eliot has to say about Tiresias: Tiresias . . . is the most important personage of the poem, uniting all the rest . . . . What Tiresias sees, in fact is the substance of the poem (148). From this, many critics have inferred that Tiresias is the protagonist of the poem (Dick 72). A careful reading of this note shows that while Tiresias is identified specifically as "the most important personage in the poem," it is what he "sees" (Eliot's emphasis) that is "the substance" of the poem (Bolgan 32). This effectively eliminates him as the main protagonist. Furthermore, Eliot points out only that Tiresias "sees," but says nothing about what Tiresias speaks. To the casually educated reader, the speaker of the opening lines of The Waste Land appears to be a well-educated Englishman who would speak with ease and elegance. The sound of the words on reading moves into
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Waste Land, World War, Land Eliot, Eliot Vivian, Eliot Montgomery, God Truth, Tiresias Tiresias, Sweet Thames, Madame Sosotris, waste land, Browning Eliot, eliot ed, 20th century, , waste land eliot, land eliot, allen unwin 1978, richmond kew, arbor umi, ann arbor, london george allen, house 1986, george allen unwin, draft waste land, fire sermon,
Approximate Word count = 4050
Approximate Pages = 16 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$