TRENDS IN WORLD POLITICS
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The current international system is in a state of post-cold war adjustment, in which numerous countries who share political or religious alliances are attempting to define their place in the world absent the tensions that accompanied the United States-Soviet Union arms race. The geographical areas that are the testing grounds for political power on the global stage may be loosely divided into four areas: the United States, China and Japan, Europe, and the Middle East. The concerns that face these areas include America's decline as a hegemonic power, the European Union and its increased economic power, the growing threat of disease, the possession of nuclear arms by rogue countries, and the continuing problems of a growing world population with decreasing resources. The United States no longer has a unified Soviet Union to fear, which has the peculiar effect of reducing tension among the two powers while at the same time causing confusion among the rest of the world. As long as there were two big-power actors on the world stage, the identities of the outsiders was easily defined. Today, identities are not as clear, borders are increasingly fuzzy (witness the current problems in Bosnia and Palestine) and what was once a balance of power between the US. and the Soviet Union is now an imbalance, with the U.S. as the remaining "superpower" and other countries existing in the power vacuum. The U.S. faces political problems from these count
. . .
ower. So far, this policy has not worked.
Occasionally, a state need not take direct action. Frequently, a state may simply use threats to accomplish its political goals. Implied power, or perceived power, is often times sufficient to persuade an opposing force to relent. As well, a state may promise rewards to other states in return for cooperation. These rewards may come in the form of monetary aid, medical help, use of military forces, and access to ports and landing strips. When a state uses threats, their effectiveness is predicated on their credibility. Every state has the power to make threats, but a state must be able to carry the threats out(or give the appearance of being able to do so) in order for the threats to have power.
A state may also gain power through intelligence gathering. When a state is apprised of another state's current actions and future plans, and can effectively analyze the plans, it gains power. It can encourage or subvert such plans based on the intelligence gathered. Lack of intelligence regarding another state's plans, particularly during wartime, can have devastating effects, and can result in savagely reducing a state's capacity to wield power.
Finally, a state may gain power through diplo
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Japan China, Soviet Union, Nations AIDS, Russett Starr, Fidel Castro, Berlin Wall, Middle East, Syria Libya, Saddam Hussein, Joe Smith, soviet union, decision maker, decision makers, middle east, gain power, russett starr, international politics, usable power, power usable, state's power, power gain power, power usable power, change definition role, current international system,
Approximate Word count = 2962
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page)
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
