The Term Limits Movement
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The term limits movement is a political movement which arose in the early 1990s with the avowed intent of limiting members of state legislatures and Congress to a fixed maximum time of service in a given body, after which they would no longer be eligible for reelection. By 1995, 23 states had enacted measures limiting terms for their members of Congress, and still more had limited terms of state legislators. However, on May 27, 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all laws limiting terms for Congress, ruling that congressional terms could only be limited by a Constitutional amendment ("Supreme Court," 1995, p. 1480). Term limit laws applying to state legislatures were not affected by this ruling. Popular support for term limits has been part of a broader discontent with the political process, a discontent which also found expression for example in Ross Perot's third-party bid for the White House in 1992. However, the term limits movement was also seized upon by Republican strategists who saw it as a means to break what they perceived as a Democratic lock on Congress, and particularly the House of Representatives. Thus, a federal term-limits law was one of the proposed measures offered in the House Republican "Contract with America" during the 1994 elections ("Signed, sealed and delivered," 1995, p. 11). Ironically, the 1994 election gave the Republicans a majority in the House for the first time in 40 years. This at once undermined both GOP enthusiasm for ter
. . .
ved several terms in Congress or in the state legislature? This argument was indirectly the basis for the Supreme Court's ruling against Congressional term limits. The Constitution sets forth certain qualifications which members of Congress must meet, and the court held that states are not entitled to impose any further restrictions on who can be elected to Congress.
The other fundamental criticism offered by critics of term limits is that the people already have at hand the means to limit the terms of any legislator: They can simply refuse to reelect that person in the next election. Incumbents indeed can be and are turned out of office when their constituents are no longer satisfied with their performance. The 1994 Congressional elections demonstrated that the whole political balance of Congress can be changed in an election, with no need for term limits to force incumbents out.
Indeed, the high overall rate of reelection for incumbents may be misleading; incumbents who know they are unlikely to be reelected often choose to retire rather than face the embarrassment of a reelection defeat. The average length of service of a member of Congress during the past couple of decades has in fact been less than the 12 years p
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Supreme Court, Supreme Court's, House Representatives, Contract America, Washington Beltway, Congress Moreover, Republican Contract, , Social Security, term limits, Republican Party's, term limit, supreme court, 1994 election, terms congress, critics term, critics term limits, term limit laws, limit laws, legislative bodies, advantages incumbency, house representatives, term limits movement, term limits 1995, contract america 1994,
Approximate Word count = 1710
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on The Term Limits Movement
|