Psychology and Sociology
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Psychology and sociology are two disciplines in the social sciences whose practitioners are likely to produce different images of human adaptive behavior. This study will compare and contrast the sociological ideas in Peter l. Berger's Invitation to Sociology and the psychological ideas in Jerome Bruner's Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. The ideas of these two disciplines will be shown to both oppose and complement each other. For example, the ideas of Sigmund Freud, representing psychology, and the ideas of Max Weber, representing sociology, clash in terms of their depiction of the ways human beings adapt. On the other hand, the ideas of cognitive psychology complement the ideas of sociologist Emile Durkheim Weber with respect to the reality of the world in which human adaptive behavior takes place. Stanley Bailis argues that the interrelating of different social sciences can be either useful or counter-productive. His essay, he says has two main purposes: to indicate how the ad hoc use of different disciplines has led American Studies to the point of incoherency; and to describe an integrative conception of the social sciences which may help to reduce their contribution to this problem (Bailis, N.D., 202). In other words, two social sciences can be brought together either to confuse or clarify the subject at hand. The problem for those in different realms of social science is to find a way to "amalgamate factors which the disciplines divide" (Bailis, N.D., 202).
. . .
that he will be able to change society in the way he wishes. Also, Weber's individual may be free, but he is nevertheless inevitably a part of society and cannot escape that connection:
The individual who is conscious of his own freedom does not stand outside the world of causality, but rather perceives his own volition as a very special category of cause, different from the other causes that he must reckon with (Berger, 1963, 123).
A final great differences is that for the psychoanalyst Freud the aim of science is to create a new identity only for the individual, whereas for Weber the focus is on the affect the free individual can have on society, even if the change he brings about is not the one intended.
Comparing the ideas of Freud (psychology) and Weber (sociology) produces different images of human adaptive behavior. On the other hand, comparing the ideas of cognitive psychology with the sociological ideas of Durkheim produces complementary images of human adaptive behavior. Both Durkheim's sociology and cognitive psychology begin with the assumption that the world or society in which the individual adapts is an objective one which must be treated as a fact if the individual's adaptation is to have any meaning or pos
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Unreason Bruner, Bailis ND, Accordingly Bruner, , Stanley Bailis, Max Weber, cognitive psychologist, American Studies, Minds Worlds, Durkheim Weber, cognitive psychology, bruner 1986, human adaptive, social sciences, adaptive behavior, human adaptive behavior, Invitation Sociology, external world, berger 1963, sociology cognitive psychology, integrative conception, human mind, images human adaptive, strategies deploying knowledge, knowledge achieve intended,
Approximate Word count = 1789
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Psychology and Sociology
|