Three Russian Novels
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This study will examine the changing nature of the hero in three Russian works, Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, Alexander Pushkin's The Captain's Daughter, and Mikhail Lermontov's A Hero of Our Time. The study will be based on the view that the "hero" of these three works is not a heroic figure in the traditional sense, but is more an anti-hero, a person who in one case (Grinyov in Pushkin) is a weak man who is blown to and fro by circumstances, and, in the other two cases, is far more flawed than such traditional, classical heroes, and far more flawed than the bulk of the readers. What makes the anti-hero in these stories who he is is precisely the fact that he is meant to bring not admiration from the reader, but rather annoyance at best and repulsion at worst. The reader is forced to experience the anti-hero's thoughts and feelings and the terrible consequences of his actions (in the case of the protagonists in Dostoevsky and Lermontov), resulting, first, in repulsion, and then, perhaps, in compassion (as with Lermontov's protagonist), or even in wisdom and a sense of redemption (as with Dostoevsky's protagonist). Perhaps the reader is being asked to identify with the anti-hero for these very purposes, not to look up to the hero, but to look down on the anti-hero in order to be more human, more compassionate and wise, more accepting of the "anti-heroic" dimension in human existence, in the reader himself as well as in the protagonist. A major difference between
. . .
believes that he cannot behave in any other way. Because of this conflict, he is a tormented man. Although one may judge him for his evil ways and feel he deserves his death, one also cannot help but feel some sorrow for the soul of such a lost man who knows he is lost. If the reader is merely repulsed, then he or she has failed to understand the author's purpose, which is to bring about some measure of compassion or understanding for Pechorin.
Dostoevsky's anti-hero, Raskolnikov, can be seen as a man without a God, without morals, without social or psychological guidelines to follow. In other words, like Lermontov's anti-hero, Raskolnikov is a man loose in the world with no ethical compass. Like Pechorin, with no such compass, Raskolnikov is drawn to evil, in this case murder for little economic gain, primarily murder for the sake of experiencing murder. Both Pechorin and Raskolnikov are men who have goodness within them, but, because of some combination of personal and social failure, they are unable to put that goodness into action.
One major difference in the two anti-heroes is that Pechorin dies in such a lost state, while Raskolnikov finds a Christian redemption, but only after he has been hunted down by the police and
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Lermontov Pechorin, Dostoevsky Lermontov, Lermontov Grinyov, Pushkin's Grinyov, Grinyov Pushkin, Pechorin Dostoevsky's, Raskolnikov Pechorin, Grinyov Pushkin's, Raskolnikov Christian, Pechorin Pechorin, dostoevsky lermontov, hero anti-hero, traditional hero, crime punishment, major difference, portrait single, captain's daughter, sense wrong, pechorin completely, pechorin dies,
Approximate Word count = 1638
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Three Russian Novels
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
