Young v. New York Transit Authority

In 1989, the Legal Action Center for the Homeless (LACH) filed suit in the district court on behalf of itself and the two homeless men named above as representative plaintiffs for a class of homeless and needy persons engaged in panhandling in the New York subway system. the original complaint stated that the prohibition against begging and panhandling in the subway violated the rights of free speech, due process, and equal protection of the law. The complaint claimed that enforcement of the regulation violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, as well as an article of the New York State Constitution. The plaintiffs sought injunctive relief while the case was pending and so

. . .
ence was offered that the presence of beggars and panhandlers on the subway was perceived by the ridership as a problem. The district court considered these issues and granted the injunction. The court found that a total ban on begging and panhandling did not serve a narrow state interest and that the rules should have been designed to constitute reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. The court also found that there were serious questions as to the constitutionality of such a ban in terms of it being an infringement of free speech. The appeals court took this up and considered the claim by the plaintiffs that begging is speech. The issue is a question of whether this particular conduct constitutes speech for the purposes of the Constitution. The plaintiffs stated that whenever a homeless or needy person is extending his hand, he is communicating. The appeals court questioned this: We initiate our discussion by expressing grave doubt as to whether begging and panhandling in the subway are sufficiently imbued with a communicative character to justify constitutional protection (153). The court reasoned first that common sense shows us that begging is more "conduct" than "speech," but conduct can have sufficient
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Transit Authority, Using O'Brien, Vietnam War, Supreme Court, Homeless LACH, Operation Enforcement, School District, Subway System, York Constitution, Texas Johnson, transit authority, subway system, district court, begging panhandling, court found, york transit authority, court considered, panhandling subway, york transit, appeals court, begging panhandling subway, organized charities, des moines independent, independent community school, moines independent community,
Approximate Word count = 1560
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Young v. New York Transit Authority