Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Tariffs on Imported Steel

This is an excerpt from the paper...

The proposed imposition of tariffs and/or other trade restrictions on imported steel in order to protect the U.S. domestic steel industry evokes a long-standing dispute about the necessity and/or efficacy of protectionist policies. A number of the issues are raised in the problem itself--that this is considered a necessary industry needed by the nation, that foreign firms sell their goods in a protected domestic market, that many have subsidies by their governments, that we have to do the same to compete, and so on.

Such protectionist policies are a form of import substitution, an attempt to replace commodities that are being imported with domestic sources of production and supply. Usually, the first step is to erect stiff trade barriers or quotas on certain important commodities. The second step is to set up a local industry to produce those same goods, and typically this involves joint ventures with foreign companies which are encouraged to set up their plants with tariff protection. In this case, the local industry already exists but has not been faring well by comparison. Often, we give such industries a variety of tax and investment incentives, again mirroring what the foreign country has been doing with subsidies and tax breaks domestically. The cost of production may at first be higher than former import prices, but it is expected that the industry will in time be able to reap the benefits of large-scale production and lower costs or that the balance of payme

. . .
to destroy the most promising aspect of today's world economy: the beginning of widespread economic development" (Krugman 67). Protectionism has an effect in the country U.S. companies are being protected from and beyond. Krugman indicates that a shortsighted effort to protect a domestic industry cold reduce the ability of developing nations to create an industry of their own, noting that "Economic growth in the Third World is an opportunity, not a threat" (Krugman 67). The U.S. should not erect trade barriers to free trade in the steel industry. Doing so does not counter trade barriers or protectionist efforts elsewhere and indeed may merely encourage them as retaliation. Developing world markets is a better way to open new markets and allow competition on a larger scale. Work Cited Krugman, Paul. Pop Internationalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1998. The central character in the novel A Deadly Indifference by Marshall Jevons is economist Henry Spearman, a man who makes decisions and judges events on the basis of economic principles. For instance, early in the novel he is on a train with his wife, Pidge, who begins remembering their dating pattern, which she realizes was unusual: "The peculiarity
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
, Competitiveness Report, Chinese Communism, Spearman Pidge, Henry Spearman, Mill Spearman, Third World, Communism Spearman's, Adam Smith, Communism Spearman, protect domestic, determining factor, economic principles, domestic industry, world economy, trade barriers, choice determining factor, tariff protection, krugman 67, taking cash, krugman 83, krugman 83 krugman, protect domestic industry,
Approximate Word count = 1522
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$