Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The environmental ideologies of deep ecology and feminist ecology (or ecofeminism) share many points of agreement, but also offer a subtle contrast in their approaches to problems of the environment. With respect to their environmental goals, it would appear that the two would not find serious disagreement with one another at all. After all, they both agree that the corporations which are destroying the environment must be stopped. The deep ecologists are known to use more radical tactics than ecofeminists, but beyond that it appear at first that they could work together cooperatively on some level. However, we will examine the basic ideological difference between the two movements, and will argue that the approach of the ecofeminists is the more realistic, in terms of having any real hope of accomplishing the goals of environmentalists. The deep ecologists recognize that they are dealing with a destructive force (those who would destroy the environment for profit) and that force must be met with furious and fearless tactics which now and then verge on destruction themselves. The ecofeminists become lost in the subtleties of ideology and forget that the people they are fighting are without conscience and without ideology, except the ideology of profit. Luc Ferry writes in The New Ecological Order that the two camps share some areas of agreement: At first glance, one might think that such a program would place ecofeminism close to deep ecology. Are not both movements bas
. . .
es as beer-willing, ass-kicking, "dumb-cowboy rednecks" (Seager 639).
For the deep ecologists, the ecofeminist critique of male vs. female issues is an ineffective and limited ideology at best, and a dangerous waste of time at worst. Dave Foreman, a spokesperson for the radical Earth First! organization, writes in "Putting the Earth First" that he found that the traditional methods of protest used by the Wilderness Society, for example, were having little effect on those forces out to destroy the environment for profit. In response, he helped form Earth First! Some of the principles of that organization make clear that the deep ecologists have apparent disdain for the ideological hang-ups of the ecofeminists. They deliberately challenge and defy traditional lines of environmental/ideological debate which has generally been humanistic-oriented. The deep ecologists include the following among their principles:
A Placing of Earth First in All Decisions, Even Ahead of Human Welfare if Necessary. . . . A Refusal to Use Human Beings as the Measure by Which to Value Others.
. . . A Realization that Wilderness is the Real World.
. . . A Deep Questioning of, and Even an Antipathy to, "Progress" and "Technology." . . . A Refusal to
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Marti Kheel, Luc Ferry, Thinking Foreman, , Ecology Despite, Wilderness Society, deep ecologists, Bedford Books, deep ecology, Dave Foreman, Putting Earth, Sierra Club, robert cullen bonnie, lisle boston bedford, boston bedford, lisle boston, bonnie lisle, books 1995, cullen bonnie, bedford books, bonnie lisle boston, cullen bonnie lisle, putting earth, boston bedford books, colombo robert,
Approximate Word count = 1609
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Deep Ecology and Ecofeminism
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
