Abortion and Judicial and Legislative Developments
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Abortion, the termination of a pregnancy either through miscarriage or surgical procedure, is an issue that has been argued for centuries from a physical, moralistic and emotional point of view. The close of the 1980s is witnessing a resurgence of the issue, unparalleled in years. The purpose of this paper is to discuss abortion in light of the new judicial and legislative developments begun in 1989, pointing out the rational and emotional flaws in both pro and con arguments. With contraceptives available and sex education now addressed within the school systems, the conclusion of any argument on abortion today is that it is unjustifiable except in certain cases. In 1973, the Supreme Court, in the case of Roe v. Wade, decided that the right to privacy included a right to abortion ("Toward" 75). Further, it held that states could forbid abortion in the last ten weeks of pregnancy unless it was deemed necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother. Abortion advocates believed the war bad been won and the practice of abortion became part of sex education in America and other countries around the world. Today, almost one out of three pregnancies in America ends in abortion ("Abortion" 71). However, those against abortion, known as "pro-life" or "right-to-lifers," had been waiting for the inevitable change of public and political sentiment in favor of their position. The end of the 1980s and the effects of the Ronald Reagan presidency proved, in their estimate,
. . .
three weeks, an unborn to many does not seem to be a baby, however, at twenty weeks they have no doubt of its presence. The reaction is totally subjective. It says nothing about who or what is there, only what people feel is there. Richard John Neuhaus, in "After Roe," writes: "This response is nothing more than an exercise in raw emotivism, which would also jeopardize the moral credibility of laws regarding persons and rights in connections other than abortion" (39).
Further, the debate is not over time in the womb but over the weighing of a human life against the reasons for terminating that life. The radical pro-choice believe any consideration is sufficient to terminate. A more moderate view is that some reason must be given, and the reason must not be shallow or voluntary. As the controversy continues, many may find that proposals with gradations of choice to be appealing.
When pro-life advocates were analyzing ways to overturn Roe v. Wade, they turned to the health effects of abortion to build their case around, believing that the moral issue would be too abstract for their purposes. President Reagan, at their behest, requested a study in June of 1987. However, due to the limited good data on abortion and the m
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Bush Administration, Roe Wade, Action League, Supreme Court, , Wade Holden, Neuhaus Roe, Health Services, Everett Koop, President Reagan, roe wade, human life, holden 730, rape incest, pro-life supporters, neuhaus 39, supreme court, life begins, health effects, health effects abortion, holden 731, human life begins, effects abortion women,
Approximate Word count = 1916
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Abortion and Judicial and Legislative Developments
|