Four Psychological Theories of Child Development
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Theories about child development are helpful to professionals and parents who are interested in the nature of children and how best to assist them in their development. However, one can become confused if a particular theory or group of theories are regarded as absolute fact. It is important to recognize that child development theories are ideas regarding beliefs about children and the nature of their personalities and behavior. As one examines various theories of psychologists, it becomes evident that one's own belief system may or may not mesh with that of the standard theorists. It is the purpose of this paper to systematically examine the theories of Freud, Skinner, Piaget, and Erikson and form some personal responses to their theories.According to R. Murray Thomas, theories or models are ways of looking at the facts regarding a situation. They may reflect a particular world view. He suggests several standards to keep in mind when looking at various theories regarding the development of children. First, a theory is better if it most accurately reflects the actual world of children (Thomas, 1992, p. 17). Problems may develop with this standard if a theorist constructs a model based on only a few children or on children of a particular type. Thomas says theories are better if they are stated in a way that any competent person could understand them. A theory is better if it can accurately predict the be
. . .
his work is rich and interesting for any education professional who might encounter various ethnic groups. His work with Native Americans reveals thought-provoking contrasts in the areas of child-rearing, interesting reading for anyone who wishes to critically examine his own cultural beliefs. In a broad way, professionals may extend Erikson's concepts to working with children who are grappling with their life tasks. If they feel that they are competent, able to make choices, make things and do things, and extend themselves to others, it is more likely that they will do well in all aspects of living (Schickedanz, Schickedanz, Hansen, & Forsyth, 1993, p. 54).
Personally, I find Erikson's work a credible extension of the theories of Freud, although somewhat lacking in the richness of the psychological inner life of the individual. He extends growth and development into the adult years which gives hope and understanding to persons working on their own developmental tasks or empathy with other adults in their world. A limitation that concerns me is there is no built-in remediation for children or adults, for that matter, who encounter difficulties with any particular stage. What if it becomes evident that a child is stuck fee
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Personally Erikson's, Werner Smith, Skinner Piaget, According Freud, Hansen Forsyth, According Erikson, According Maccoby, Murray Thomas, Theories Theories, Freud Austrian, thomas 1992, child development, developmental tasks, freudian theory, schickedanz hansen forsyth, hansen forsyth, according freud, forsyth 1993, schickedanz hansen, thomas theories, schickedanz schickedanz hansen, smith 1992, hansen forsyth 1993, theories child development, deal specifically learning,
Approximate Word count = 3179
Approximate Pages = 13 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Four Psychological Theories of Child Development
|