Coal and Nuclear Fuels
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The following research is on the subject of the advantages and disadvantages of the use of coal and of nuclear fuels in the production of electricity. The mineral and fuel reserves of this planet are not limitless, and the future will require the discovery of new resources and sources for the production of energy. Coal is one replacement for the use of oil in the production of electricity, and nuclear fuels are under consideration as well. However, nuclear fuels in particular are under fire from environmental groups fearful of the possibility of a melt-down in a nuclear reactor, which could conceivably spread death and destruction over a wide area. Coal and nuclear fuels each have a place in the future of energy production, and each also has certain drawbacks which limit their use to certain areas.I. MINING AND PROCESSING OF THE FUEL A single electrical generating plant producing 380,000-kw requires a total of one million gallons of oil per day; a large 1.2 million-kw coal-fired plant uses fuel at the rate of 8000 tons of coal -- or about one hundred railroad cars full -- every day. Coal beds are no longer sought, for most of them have been located and only need to be explored further to determine their rank, ash content, continuity, thickness and depth over an area where mining is contemplated. Advances in the mining of coal have been considerable in recent years. In most underground mines today continuous mining machines are used. These use draglines with buck
. . .
of more than one thousand miles now planned. If construction and maintenance energy costs of a railroad are to be charged largely or mainly to coal haulage, the coal slurry pipeline is a more efficient system of transportation, comparable to the natural gas pipeline. Such pipeline transport costs between 60 and 70% of the price of unit-train haulage.
The amounts of fissionable materials needed for nuclear power are much smaller, and they can be transported by rail or by truck, generally specially-shielded if there is any danger of radiation.
4. COST
Coal is seen as having a great potential for contributing to the needs of high energy society. It is more versatile today as a fuel source than when it was the mainstay of power in the world during the Industrial Revolution. Coal can be converted into gaseous or liquid fuels that can be transported by tanker and pipeline or used near the conversion plants. It can be burned in power plants near the mine, and the resultant electricity can be transmitted hundreds of miles over ultra-high voltage lines. It can also provide benefits by operating in place of the rapidly depleting reserves of oil and gas. Unfortunately, the tendency to ignore coal over the past few years is now
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Turkey Europe, WASTE DISPOSAL, PERSONAL SAFETY, Revolution Coal, Mountains Southwest, AVAILABILITY Coal, Illinois Indiana, War II, Nevada America, PROCESSING FUEL, nuclear power, fossil fuels, power plants, coal beds, nuclear fuels, nuclear energy, nuclear power plants, feet deep, coal bed, short term, coal mining, acid mine drainage, associated fossil fuels, coal nuclear fuels, world war ii,
Approximate Word count = 3249
Approximate Pages = 13 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Coal and Nuclear Fuels
|