Nuclear power as a Political Issue
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Nuclear power is no longer a relatively new phenomenon which impacts both on culture and society. Since the early 1960s, companies have searched for an inexpensive way in which to generate power for the increasingly demanding American society. Indeed, the debate over nuclear power shows just how much the illusions of the nuclear age are "rooted in the economic and political institutions of our society. The system for threatening nuclear war - the designing, making, deploying, explaining of nuclear weapons - serves so many short-term interests that as a society we are crippled in confronting out most basic interest: physical, economic and spiritual survival" (Loeb, 1983, p. 3). In the 1980s, however, nuclear power has become an even greater political issue that has been thrust into national, and with the recent Chernobyl disaster in the Soviet Union, international prominence. According to many experts, what is especially changing in the demographic attitude, is the fact that many individuals are becoming even more aware of the issues surrounding nuclear power, and are demanding a say in the decisions about placement, deployment, or even the viability, of nuclear power within this modern industrial society (Berger, 1977, p. 7). In the paper, we will briefly present an overview the history and use of nuclear power, and will then concentrate on the hazards of nuclear power, as articulated from many sources. Throughout the paper, an underlying assumption will be that nuc
. . .
ons regarding the hazards of nuclear power. Initially, most say, there are a series of unresolved generic problems with the design and construction of power plants, given the current technological expertise available. These problems have the potential for serious problems, not just internally within the plant, but for the environment and populations near the facility (Adato et al., 1987, pp. 12-17). Second, the scientists say, there is collusion between the bureaucratic NRC and the Utility Companies, in which the public is often treated in an adversarial capacity, with advanced advertising techniques and misinformation promulgated in order to obtain licensing (Adato et al., 1987, pp. 46-52). This directly leads to the third point: that the NRC is arbitrary in its enforcement of regulations that were federally mandated in order to ensure the public good. Sometimes motivated by greed, other times by complex political maneuvering, the NRC does not seem to operate on any consistent notation of the legal aspects of its enforcement capacity (Adato et al., 1987, pp. 77-83). Finally, say many of the scientists, the real problem of nuclear power lies "in the fraternal relationship between the NRC and its licensees. The agency appea
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Utility Companies, Cambridge Harris, Kaku Trainer, Glasstone Jordan, Soviet Union, , Concerned Scientists, nuclear power, Energy Act, Commission NRC, Manhattan Project, power plants, nuclear power plants, et al, adato et al, adato et, utility companies, et al 1987, al 1987, nuclear technology, hazards nuclear, current technological, atomic energy, hazards nuclear power, kaku trainer 1982,
Approximate Word count = 2232
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)
|