Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Forms of Love

This is an excerpt from the paper...

That how we use language is important can be easily seen in the use of the word "love" in English. When a person says "I love you" to another, the recipient of such a compliment cannot always be sure what is meant. Too often, filled with high minded thoughts of angels and God, the person imagines by speaking the word "love" he means something noble. Meanwhile, his intentions may well be motivated by a part of the body instead of soul.

English speakers meanwhile have trouble substituting "I lust you" for "I love you" because, though more accurate, it's too blunt, and needs a preposition. The Greek words "agapé," "phileo," "storgé," and "eros" are the words that the Greeks used which our one English word "love" tries to express. In English one must determine context and character to know the difference.

C.S. Lewis has helped the English speaker greatly by writing about The Four Loves. He begins the "Introduction" by putting man in his place in this subject, which is vitally important for any human who reads the book to understand before all else. He distinguishes between "gift love" and "need love" and notes that God is responsible for the former while man can only muster the latter at best. And while he states "I cannot now deny the name love to Need-love" (12) he adds "No doubt Need-love, like all our impulses, can be selfishly indulged (13). But he also clarifies that our need for love is as much a need as our need for food. Thus, "man's love for god, from the very nat

. . .
nd repent. Lewis also explains the love that holds the church together, in Jesus' oft repeated commandment to love (phileo) one another. He cites Emerson: "Do you love me? means Do you see the same truth? -- Or at least, 'Do you care about the same truth?" (97). Members of the body of Christ, then, are friends in the fullest sense of the word: they love the same person, who loves each of them, and loves and blesses their fellowship (Koinonea) where they share Jesus with each other. Lewis thus gives an intriguing and ironic observation: "The little knots of Friends who turn their backs on the "World" are those who really transform it" (101). And is that not what Christ commands His church to do: reject the world, and in so doing transform it by then being salt and light? This also explains why "friendship with the world is enmity with God (James 4:4). Another ironic observation is that the baser, more natural loves are used by God to describe His love: "Affection is taken as the image when god is represented as our Father; Eros, when Christ is represented as the Bridegroom of the Church" (112-113). But we should expect that when we consider that Friendship "has no survival value; rather it is one of those things which give val
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Holy Spirit, Campbell Lewis, Realization Pieper, John Apostle's, Contrasts Peiper, Prudence Charity, Noah Noah's, CS Lewis, Cardinal Virtues, Unfortunately Pieper, holy spirit, word love, friendship god, brave temperate, faith james 2, fortitude temperance, writing loves, faith james, justice fortitude, james 2, justice fortitude temperance, warning ignored,
Approximate Word count = 4174
Approximate Pages = 17 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$