John Stuart Mill on Utilitarianism
This is an excerpt from the paper...
. John Stuart Mill answers the charge that utilitarianism cannot accommodate justice and individual rights in terms of his view of the meaning of utility. He approaches the obligations of both the state and the individual in terms of his Harm Principle as introduced in On Liberty, a principle addressing the basic issue of when power can be exercised over any individual member of a civilized community against his or her will. Mill says such power cannot be wielded except to prevent harm to others. Mill thus takes an anti-parentalist view. There are those who see the government acting in loco parentis, or in place of the parent, imposing restrictions for the individual's own good. Mill opposes any such notion. Mill begins his discussion of moral theory with a definition of utilitarianism, stating that this is the creed that accepts utility as the foundation of morals, meaning the greatest happiness principle. This holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, and wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Happiness means the intended pleasure and the absence of pain, while unhappiness means pain and the privation of pleasure. While Mill agrees that those actions which produce happiness are good and those that produce pain are bad, it is not the happiness or pain of the person taking action that is necessarily the guide. Rather, it is a more abstract happiness overall that is being
. . .
individual freedom, a principle based on utilitarian concepts and applicable to the individual in his or her dealings with society. He says that individuals can best gain their happiness in a civilized society when they are free to pursue their own interest. Mill thus asserts the principle of non-interference where the individual is concerned, though this applies only to adults and not to children.
Mill bases his idea on the self-development of the individual. He does not, however, base this idea on any sense that there is a natural right on the part of the individual to develop himself freely, and instead he bases it on the principle of utility. This principle says that each individual should be free to develop his or her own powers and abilities according to his or her will or judgment as long as they do so in a way that does not interfere with the rights of others. From the standpoint of society, says Mill, this is also desirable because it is preferable that individuals develop themselves freely since this enhances society, while having everyone conform does not.
Works Cited
Kelly, J. M. A Short History of Western Legal Theory. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1992.
Magid, Henry M. "John Stuart Mill." In History
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Happiness Mill, Iago Elster, Jon Elster, Harm Principle, Mill Liberty, Stuart Mill, rational choice, Indiana Hackett, Joseph Cropsey, mill individual, individual believes, evidence collected, john stuart, Clarendon Press, Chicago Press, john stuart mill, bad happiness, theory rational, expected utility, elster rational choice, elster 22, sum total happiness, own mill, theory rational choice, conscience mill individual,
Approximate Word count = 2099
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on John Stuart Mill on Utilitarianism
|