Comte on Social Order and Progress
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Comte pioneered the study of social "statics" (order) and "dynamics" (progress) from his investigations into the basis of social stability (Wallace & Wolf, 1995, p. 19). He stated functionalism's basic assumption of interdependence when he said the study of social systems required investigation into the action and reaction of the different parts of the social system. He also pioneered the concept of equilibrium when he borrowed biological principles of homeostasis to illustrate that a disharmony between the whole and parts of the social system was pathological (Wallace & Wolf, 1995, p. 19). However, Comte also believed that man progresses through three states of thought and society: theological, metaphysical, and the dawning "positivist" model (Wallace & Wolf, 1995, p. 47). Thus, his theory relies on an investigation into the order of society that maintains equilibrium (statics) as the society experiences the changes that lead to its evolution (progress). Parsons and Luhmann are both heirs to Comte's practice of studying the structures that maintain equilibrium in a society as the society undergoes the necessary changes that lead to its evolution. Parsons describes a dynamic equilibrium that produces harmony for the system (Wallace & Wolf, 1995, p. 39). He argues that mechanisms of socialization and social control maintain equilibrium by fulfilling "needs" and solving recurring problems like a biological organism does in its physical environment (Wallace & Wolf, 19
. . .
onflict depending on their desire to preserve the status quo (the dominant) or change it (the dominated). This constant conflict leads to structural social changes through changes in the dominance relations (Dahrendorf, 1958, p. 80).
Collins, on the other hand, links his theory of social class, conflict, end evolution to the power each social group possesses over violence in society and the transformation of society from private to public (Collins, 1974, p. 95). For Collins, class structure is divided between the private and public sectors. In the past, private individuals possessed much greater power over violence through the ability to decide what, where, and how violent punishment would be performed. He argues that while these practices sill occur, they are now done privately and secretly by the state rather than as explicit, ceremonial enactments fundamental to social order (Collins, 1974, p. 95). The monopolization of violence by the modern state means the ritual barriers that allowed the use of private violence and motivated the retention of a specific deference structure have largely disappeared (Collins, 1974, p. 95).
Thus, Collins describes social class along traditional familial lines. Industrial society has sh
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Wallace Wolf, Marx Engels, Retreatism Merton's, Complexity Luhmann, Reasoning Deductive, Set Status, Alternatives Functionalism, Prentice Hall, Actor Parsons', According Parsons, wolf 1995, wallace wolf 1995, wallace wolf, social systems, collins 1974, prentice hall, dahrendorf 1958, contemporary sociological, sociological theory, englewood cliffs, contemporary sociological theory, collins 1974 95, social system, ed mcquarie englewood, theory 1995 ed,
Approximate Word count = 1986
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Comte on Social Order and Progress
|