Brian Hoxie v. Cato-Meridian School District

The appellant in this case is Brian Hoxie's Painting Company. The plaintiff was required to pay its employees approximately $6,000 in additional wages and supplements as a penalty for having failed to pay the prevailing wage under Labor Law ( 220-d. The Supreme Court dismissed the complaint, an action affirmed by the Appellate Division, stating that Labor Law ( 220-d applies to school districts and that a contractor has no cause of actions against the school district for any failure to comply with the notice requirements of the statute.

The Cato-Meridian School District solicited bids on a contract to paint the cupola cornice, and windows at the Cato-Meridian Middle School in July of 1983, and the advertising specifications for the bid failed to include a notice of the prevailing wage requirements. Brian Hoxie's Painting Company submitted a bid in the amount of $9,280, with the labor costs computed on the company regular. Since the c

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Labor Law, DECISIONS IMPLICATIONS, Painting Company, Department Labor, School District, Appellate Division, Supreme Court, School July, school district, prevailing wage, cause action, law 220-d, labor law, private cause, painting company, labor law 220-d, private cause action, Hoxie's Painting, Brian Hoxie's, hoxie's painting company, hoxie's painting, brian hoxie's painting, brian hoxie's, court dismissed, notice prevailing wage,
Approximate Word count = 735
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page)