Chinese and Greek Thought

Much of what is different between Chinese and Greek thought begins with the medium of expression in each culture: language. Making use of what she terms "contrastive rhetoric," Matalene (789), identifies different systems of logic contained in Chinese and Greek (Western) language. Because of conventions established in ancient Greece, in the West, linguistic practice in Western languages such as English is governed by specific rules and conventions that determine correct expression or writing. Matalene cites the view that rhetorical standards "are expressions of Western culture" (789), where writers "subscribe to Aristotle's [logical] dictum, 'State your case and prove it,' and we expect to be provided with premises and conclusions connected by inductive or deductive reasoning" (790). In the West, arguments are meant to be "cohesive, coherent, and explicitly unified" (Matalene 790).

Chinese language and philosophy are as logically constructed and expressed, but the "hierarchy of culture, language, and rhetoric" (Matalene 790) is logical differently in China than the West. The Western alphabet and the raft of what are referred to as Indo-European languages (e.g., by Cowgill and Jasanoff) are govern

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Greek Democritus, Ideal Forms, Greece West, Cowgill Jasanoff, Confucius Laotse, Names Laotse, BC Greek, Chaos Sagan, Chinese Greek, BC China, yin yang, chinese greek, laotse trans lin, trans lin yutang, 500 bc, wisdom laotse, laotse trans, cites view, rhetoric matalene, sagan 175, york modern library, yutang york modern, culture language, specific rules conventions, indo-european languages,
Approximate Word count = 1188
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Chinese and Greek Thought