Impact of Health-Care-Industry Merger
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The ultimate impact of health-care-industry mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on the patient is negative on quality and access and positive (in a bad way) on costs. This has already been documented, and it is likely that more evidence will mount for the assertion in the future. That is, patients can expect to pay more and more for less and less access to and control of health-care delivery, which in any case may be highly suspect as far as reliability is concerned.For employees in the health-care system, industry consolidation that occurs because of M&A activity can be reduced to a very familiar term: downsizing. To be sure, the health-care industry itself does not resort immediately to that term. Instead, it appears to prefer terms such as business process redesign, or "reengineering" (O'Neil & Riley, 1996), which involves cost control as much as staff expertise and training. Where cost is an issue, staff preferences are secondary to market needs and/or dynamics: New market-oriented health care organizations are willing to restructure care delivery without any concern for protecting traditional professional roles. Such efforts have aimed to reduce the number of staff who interact with patients, allocate tasks to appropriate staff based on level of training, and reduce the overall size of the RN staff (O'Neil & Riley, 1996, p. 107). De-staffing or reengineered staffing is an inevitable consequence of M&A activity, and it cuts off personal staff contact with patients, which c
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
O'Neil Riley, Labor Statistics, , Ironically Rose, Health Affairs, Spring Health, riley 1996, o'neil riley 1996, o'neil riley, health care, Schenck-Yglesias CG, m&a activity, primary care, American Demographics, schenck-yglesias 1995, rose 1999, receive care, consequence m&a, patient loads,
Approximate Word count = 1075
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Impact of Health-Care-Industry Merger
|