The Tobacco Industry and Unsafe Products
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This research examines the tobacco industry's history of producing and selling unsafe products from the standpoint of criminal justice. Using primarily John Rawls's theory of distributive justice as the theoretical basis, the research will set forth the context in which "big tobacco" engaged in the national tobacco settlement and then discuss how Rawls's theory helps explain the behavior of the industry before and after that key case was closed.The so-called master settlement of June 20, 1997, brought to a close litigation led by the state of Mississippi and supported by other states against Big Tobacco. The settlement mandated that major American tobacco firms pay $368.5 billion to settle a series of lawsuits "that effectively label[] Big Tobacco as an outlaw business, largely banned from promoting or marketing its product" (Mollenkamp, Levy, Menn, & Rothfeder, 1999, p. 18). In 1999, the US Dept. of Justice (DOJ) also sued Big Tobacco under the Medical Care Recovery Act (MCRA), the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) provisions, and the Racketeer-Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The lawsuit under the first two acts, brought to collect out of Big Tobacco's profits the billions of federal dollars spent to treat tobacco-caused illnesses, was dismissed in 2001. As of March 2002, trial under RICO is scheduled to begin in 2003. Originally designed to target the "enterprises" of organized crime, RICO was aimed at Big Tobacco for conducting a pattern of illegal activities
. . .
gh they do not vary inversely in his formulation. Rather:
[T]he purpose of criminal law is to uphold basic natural duties, those which forbid us to injure other persons in their life and limb, or to deprive them of their liberty and property. And punishments are to serve this end. . . . [I]n a just society legal punishments will only fall upon those who display these faults (Rawls, 1971, pp. 314-15).
It follows that institutions of civil society may properly enable compensation in some way to those who for various reasons may not be able to freely exercise liberty or as it were function as a full participant in the "original position," including but not limited to those whose crimes specifically infringed on their liberty.
Literature Review
Rawls's theory has been characterized as defining a moral utopia (e.g., Chilton, 1998) and as represntative of an "ethics of obligation" (Doyle, 1995, p. 7ff). It has been criticized for relying on a hypothetical in the manner of Kant's categorical imperative to account for real-world conditions (Doyle, 1995; Femia, 1998). What Doyle refers to as "pretended impartiality" fosters "intolerance for real differences" and may lead to state and legal claims of acting "in the name of the community
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Kant Rawls, Minow Doyle, Applying Rawls's, Discussion Rawls's, RJ Reynolds, John Rawls's, Master Settlement, Review Rawls's, Justice Dept's, Theory Justice, criminal justice, rawls 1971, march 2002, rj reynolds, rawls's theory, justice fairness, tobacco industry, theory justice, 1 march 2002, wide web, world wide, world wide web, web 1 march, wide web 1, retrieved world wide,
Approximate Word count = 2999
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page)
More Essays on The Tobacco Industry and Unsafe Products
|