Arbitration and Legal Malpractice

Background: The Advent of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

With the explosion of litigation in American society during the last half of the twentieth century, many commentators have championed the use of arbitration to settle legal disputes. Legislators have tended to agree with this view and have enacted numerous statutes encouraging and governing the use of arbitration in lieu of litigation. The inclusion of mandatory arbitration clauses in commercial contracts is now a widespread practice, even mandating the arbitration of issues that raise questions of significant public interest. Moreover, courts have upheld these mandatory arbitration clauses.

This acceptance of arbitration, however, has not been universally present in the area of legal malpractice for several reasons. First, only recently has there been a tremendous increase in the number of malpractice claims filed against attorneys. Second, arbitration is most likely to be considere

. . .
o evidence, discovery, and appellate review. Although many suggest that these differences are procedural, the Maryland Bar expressed the opinion that a decision to submit all disputes to arbitration over trial is sufficiently related to an attempt to limit prospective liability. Thus, the requirements outlined by Model Rule 1.8(h) should be followed. The ABA has issued further guidelines concerning mandatory arbitration clauses in retainer agreements. It has supported the view that an attorney may utilize such a clause in a retainer agreement so long as the clause does not limit the award of punitive damages, the headings of the agreement correctly reflect the substance of the document, the lawyer makes no false or misleading representations about the agreement and the lawyer fully discloses to the client all of the implications of the arbitration provision, including the loss of the client's right to sue in court and have a jury trial. In the same document, the ABA approved of the following requirements, in addition to those noted above: [A] lawyer may enter into an agreement which provides compulsory and unappealable arbitration as long as (1) the client is advised in writing that he waives the right to a jury trial; (
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
South Carolina, Model Rule, Arbitration Clauses, Fee Arbitration, Professional Conduct, Haynes Kuder, Arbitration Board, Arbitration Solutions, Supreme Court, Similarly Arizona, mandatory arbitration, arbitration clauses, mandatory arbitration clauses, malpractice claims, independent counsel, arbitration clause, legal malpractice, retainer agreements, clauses retainer agreements, clauses retainer, district columbia, jury trial, mandatory arbitration clause, arbitration clauses retainer, arbitration clauses attorney-client,
Approximate Word count = 3241
Approximate Pages = 13 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Arbitration and Legal Malpractice