Sleep and Learning
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This paper offers a concise analysis of a research study described in the article, "Local Sleep and Learning" by Huber, Ghilardi, Massimini and Tononi (2004) and an evaluation of the "pop" journalist version of the same research study, "Sleeping Brain, Not At Rest" by Richard A. Lovett (2004). In the original study, Huber et al. (2004) hypothesized that the stimulation of sleep homeostasis, as measured by slow wave activity (SWA), may be increased by a learning task that involves local brain areas. Furthermore, the increase of the SWA was also hypothesized to be positively correlated with the improved performance of the same learning task after sleep.To test these hypotheses, Huber et al. (2004) measured the SWA of the subjects after they had learned to perform a rotation-oriented motor learning task that was designed to stimulate specific regions of the brain. As a comparison, the SWA of the same group of subjects was measured after they performed a no-rotation task that did not activate the regions of the brain, as a control condition. Huber et al. (2004) found that the performance of the rotation-oriented task led to an increase in the SWA in the specific regions of the brain. Moreover, the performance of the subjects in the treatment condition improved significantly when they were tested the next morning after they slept. However, to ascertain whether the improved performance was attributed to sleep, rather than the passage of time, Huber et al. (2004) conducted
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Richard Lovett, Moreover Lovett, Massimini Tononi, , research study, learning task, et al 2004, huber et, et al, al 2004, huber et al, regions brain, lovett 2004, specific learning task, specific regions, specific regions brain, specific learning, version research study, learning tasks, Ghilardi Massimini, Huber Ghilardi,
Approximate Word count = 834
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page)
|