Teacher Evaluation

To say that the various parties interested in the outcome of a given situation is not to say that the parties are necessarily adversarial. Rather, although each of the parties might have different particular interests, it may yet be in all the parties' best interest to seek a resolution that addresses everyone's concerns. This situation seems like such a case. One advantage of this case is that it does not deal with a decision to terminate the teacher's employment. As such, this is not a case where the teacher and the schnol's desires ard in inherent conflict. Rather, this appears to be a question of whether proper procedure was followed. Although the case might ultimately turn on the teacher's dissatisfaction with the content of the evaluation, all of the parties'

. . .
ected by state law. The evaluation procedures are embedded into union contracts and, therefore, the union has the duty to ensure that the contractual language is respected ("What teacher evaluation should know," 2004, p. 80). Notably, however, the union representative does not have the power to prevent the school from standing by the evaluation if it was created according to the procedure laid out in the contract. Therefore, the union's ultimate concern is not that the teacher should get a good evaluation, or that the bad evaluation should be retracted. Rather, the union representative will be concerned that the school prove it followed procedure is preparing the evaluation. Unions do not have the authority or power to prevent consequences for teachers who do not fulfill their educational responsibilities or conduct themselves according to the school rules for performance and behavior ("What teacher evaluation should know," 2004, p. 80). In that particular instance, therefore, the teacher and her union representative might have differing values as to the outcome of the grievance process. The evaluator, the school and the superintendent, on the other hand, should be primarily interested in ensuring that proper evaluation procedure
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Evaluation Introduction, Supreme Court, Director Notably, Procedure IVD-03, Effectiveness Ultimately, Ethical Issues, Colleges Roth, Plan Action, Principal Leadership, Permuth Egley, proper procedure, procedure followed, union representative, proper procedure followed, evaluation procedures, teacher evaluation, due process, evaluation procedure, ethical issues, teacher union, teacher union representative, administrative procedure ivd-03, proper evaluation, legal ethical issues, proper evaluation procedure,
Approximate Word count = 2271
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Teacher Evaluation