Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Achievement Scores Individual differences in learning and m

This is an excerpt from the paper...

Individual differences in learning and memory abilities have long been a topic for social science research. However, little basic research has been done concerning the possibility of a dichotomous split between verbal and mathematical cognitive functions. This study examines the achievement scores of a sample of college freshmen and discovers clear evidence of such a cognitive division. Limitations of the study are noted, and possibilities for future research are proposed.

Individual differences in learning and memory abilities have long been a controversial topic among researchers. Psychologists, sociologists, educators, and even politicians have struggled to either make sense of or denounce such differences. While most such studies have focused on various types of intelligence tests (e.g., Stanford-Binet) supposedly designed to measure latent intelligence (I.Q.), such tests do not attempt to break intelligence down into its component parts. Intuitively, though, we seem to infer that there are distinct differences between such cognitive functions as mathematical reasoning and verbal ability. This study will attempt to move such a notion beyond the merely intuitive and to provide scientific support for such a view.

Beyond this intuitive assumption, there is a long body of research concerning this apparent dichotomy. In 1938, Lewis Thurstone examined verbal ability, proposing it as a technical term used by cognitive a

. . .
lationship will not be hypothesized, as causality requires that effects be accounted for by referring to uncontrollable antecedents (Smith, 1988, p. 345). It is beyond the scope of this study to determine whether either verbal or mathematical ability have temporal priority over the other. Rather, the primary concern is to determine whether there are significant differences between those with high mathematical abilities and those with high verbal abilities, or whether those variables covary with one another. Hypothesis For the purposes of this study, the Dependent Variable will be Verbal Ability, as measured by scores on the Verbal component of the SAT. The independent variable will be Mathematical Ability, as measured by scores on the Quantitative component of the SAT. We expect to find that students who score highly in one area of ability score lower in another area. Our specific hypothesis is as follows: H1:Students who obtain high scores on the Quantitative component of the general SAT will have lower Verbal scores than students who obtain low scores on the Quantitative component of the general SAT. Method The hypothesis under consideration was: H1:Students who obtain high scores on the Quantitative compon
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Variable Verbal, Test SAT, University Third, SAT Support, Resnick Ford, Introduction Individual, Statement Purpose, Lewis Thurstone, Asian American, Abstract Individual, quantitative component, verbal ability, component sat, quantitative scores, scores quantitative, mathematical ability, scores quantitative component, quantitative component sat, verbal scores, dependent variable verbal, significant differences, independent variable, variable verbal, obtain low scores, students obtain low,
Approximate Word count = 1902
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Achievement Scores Individual differences in learning and m

MATH AND ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS OF GIRLS Introducti 3953 words
Influences of Culture on Academic Achievement 6112 words
Basic Categories of Teaching Models 7264 words
Telecommunications for Students 3307 words
Cooperative Learning According to Sharan and Sharan 19 2486 words
Small Group Learning 2409 words
Teaching Mathematics to Elementary Children 2725 words
Nutrition Related Activities ampamp Childrenamp39s Vocabulary 3680 words
Visually Handicapped Student ampamp Intelligence 1726 words
ROLE OF TRANSLATION IN ESL LEARNING 3943 words
Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW