CRITICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE LITERATURE The findings of the existing research generally support the notion that moderate levels of job/employee autonomy increase several employee motivators and behaviors including those of: organizational commitment, adaptation to organizational change, job performance, job satisfaction, self-esteem, use of key personality traits, and positive work attitudes. Moderate levels of employee autonomy also appear to reduce organizational costs accruing from absenteeism and turnover. However, what the research does not explain, in any comprehensive way, is why job autonomy exerts these diverse and widespread effects on employees.
In reading the job autonomy literature, the lack of a clear model explaining the diverse consequences and correlates of job autonomy was obvious. It seems reasonable, therefore, to suggest that what is needed is a comprehensive model to provide context to what are essentially discrete empirical facts about the positive effects of job/employee autonomy.
One model which, in the opinion of this researcher, seems to best fit the facts is job characteristics theory developed by Hackman and Oldham (1977). This theory attempts to explain how various job dimensions affect worker behavior.
According to the model, a number of work outcomes such as desire to perform well (that is, high internal work motivation) and job satisfaction, are influenced by the experience of three critical psychological states--the meaningfulness