DARWINISM IN AMERICA
This research paper discusse
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This research paper discusses the reception, dissemination and teaching of the views of Charles Darwin (1809-1882) in the United States since the publication of his Origin of the Species in 1859 and his The Descent of Man in 1871.Darwinism, namely, Darwin's scientific discoveries and opinions concerning the evolution of living or organic species, including humans, and the chief natural mechanism which he said governed that evolution, natural selection, challenged traditionally held Western scientific, philosophical and theological worldviews of the origin of life and the nature of man. As such, it received a mixed reaction in the United States initially and subsequently. Modern historiography suggests that the American reception accorded to Darwinism during the late 19th century represented a much more complex reality than merely a confrontation between modern scientific truth and old time religion. In fact, some portions of Darwinism appealed more than did others to mainstream American values and attitudes, even within the American scientific and intellectual community. Darwinism was also adapted by non-scientists to bolster political, social and economic assumptions and programs the significance of which modern historiography tends to discount; however, some facets of Social Darwinism mirrored important elements of the American experience and 19th century mindset. In the late 19th and early 20th century, scientific acceptance of Darwinism declined,
. . .
sh and European notions of linear and rational progress. Various mediational theologists or theistic evolutionists sought to reconcile Darwinism and Christianity. On the scientific side, Bowler said that "Huxley is now seen as a pseudo-Darwinist who had little real sympathy for natural selection . . . [and] ensured that evolutionists who used Darwin as a figurehead were able to take over the British scientific community" (68). Ruse said most English scientists accepted evolution but they "argued that natural selection could not be the only or even the main cause of evolutionary change" (206). Lay philosophers such as the novelist Samuel Butler substituted an inner life force for natural selection. He said in 1879 "God, in effect, has given living things the power to design themselves" (Bowler 97). English fundamental or evangelical Christians early on lost the battle over Darwinism in England.
American reactions to Darwinism were much more varied and tended to contain an even higher religious and other non-scientific content than in England. One pro-Darwinian strain was represented by Gray, who defended Darwin's methodology against attacks in England and America that it relied too much on unproven hypotheses and theories and insu
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Species Darwin, Social Darwinism, Origin Species, According Webb, Supreme Court, According Conser, Descent Darwin's, Neo-Lamarckism Revisionist, Commager Americans, Conclusion Darwin's, natural selection, public schools, 19th century, american scientific, social darwinism, darwin's theory, late 19th, late 19th century, american society, darwin's theories, evolution natural, evolution natural selection, darwin's theory evolution, darwinism late 19th, concept natural selection,
Approximate Word count = 5490
Approximate Pages = 22 (250 words per page)
|