Government Security
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this research is to examine the issues concerning government security. The plan of the research will be to set forth the context in which the subject of government-related security measures of various kinds has achieved importance, and then to discuss the variety of views, some of them controversial, surrounding such subsidiary topics as document control and destruction, security predicated of the government's view of one's so-called «MDUL»need to know«MDNM», legal and ethical issues in regard to mailing and reproduction of documents, and such issues of access control as personnel identification, whether by badges or other means.There appears to be an inherent tension between the idea of democracy and the idea of government security in the modern period, for the boundaries between what democratic values a government has to give up in order to maintain the security of democracy seem blurred. Indeed, there is evidence of a progressive blurring on one hand and a progressive preoccupation with security on the part of democratic and nondemocratic societies alike on the other. In the 1830s, de Tocqueville's observations on America included the remark that the successful conduct of foreign relations demands scarcely any qualities that democracy is noted for, but almost all that it is deficient in.«FN~«LM8»«RM73»«IP5,0»Alexis de Tocqueville, «MDUL»Tocqueville's America: The Great Quotations«MDNM», ed. Frederick Kershner, Jr. (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1983
. . .
1974) 51-2.
» However, the Nixon White House subsequently approved piecemeal domestic-intelligence gathering in the name of national security, including illegal surveillance of American citizens and groups that were deemed unfriendly to the administration. This was the period of the unauthorized disclosure by Daniel Ellsberg of the so-called Pentagon Papers, a "top-secret history of the Vietnam war . . . [that] became a defense of [CIA] Agency analysts who had warned that the [military] build-up wouldn't work and a cover-up of the CIA's counterinsurgents who had helped make the build-up happen.«FN~«LM8»«RM73»«IP5,0»Steve Weissman, "Crying Wolf at Watergate, «MDUL»Big Brother and the Holding Company: The World Behind Watergate«MDNM», ed. Steve Weissman (New York: Ramparts Press, 1974) 35-6.
» It was also the period of the so-called "Enemies List," comprising the names of some 200 persons the White House considered it appropriate to spy on.«FN~«LM8»«RM73»«IP5,0»Stu Bishop, "Charles Colson--Superspy," «MDUL»Big Brother and the Holding Company: The World Behind Watergate«MDNM», ed. Steve Weissman (New York: Ramparts Press, 1974) 247.
»
The views of various commentators writing in the 1980s reflect concern to balance the dem
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
York Times«MDNM», War Fulbright's, Ramparts Press, , Cold War, Hearing«MDNM» November, Digital Age, Street Journal«MDNM», Law Review«MDNM», Clipper Chip, national security, steve weissman, york ramparts press, ramparts press 1974, weissman york ramparts, press 1974, ramparts press, weissman york, world watergate«mdnm», york ramparts, «mdul»big holding, steve weissman york, company world watergate«mdnm», company world, holding company,
Approximate Word count = 6647
Approximate Pages = 27 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Government Security
|