Guerrilla Warfare
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This research examines the concept of guerrilla warfare, identifies applications of the concept, and analyzes the moresignificant of these applications. First, through examination of the concept, and its role in the process of political devel opment, guerrilla warfare is defined, and explained. Second, instances of the application of the guerrilla warfare concept are identified in the contexts of insurgents, incumbents, and locale. Lastly, through analysis of the more significant applications of the guerrilla warfare concept, an effort is made to identify those factors which caused guerrilla warfare efforts to be either successes or failures."Guerrilla warfare as a form of resistance to foreign occupation or an unpopular domestic government" has been around "for the better part of forever . . ." (Dyer, 1985, 161). Thus, while guerrilla warfare is part war, it is also part political participation, and part diplomacy. Francisco de Vitoria (1525) established the modern concept of international law with respect to war, which holds that war is licit as a last resort, when all other means of persuasion 2have failed. Thus, war becomes an extension of political par ticipation, diplomacy. This concept goes on to hold that the cause which justifies war is the violation of a right, and that "an essential condition for the licitness of a war is that the evils resulting from it will not be greater than
. . .
ns, 1971, 216 217):
1. The coercing party must have a strong and unified motivation.
2. There must be an apparent advantage for the coer cing party.
3. There must be a sense of urgency in the conflict situation from the perspective of the coercing party.
4. The coercing party must have realistic military options.
5. The party being coerced must fear an unacceptable escalation of the conflict.
6. The acceptable terms for a settlement of the con flict situation must be precise and fully known.
There are two general variants of the coercive diplomacy strategy the weak variant and the strong variant (George, Hall, and Simons, 1971). The weak variant is called a 13"try and see" approach (George, Hall, and Simons, 1971, 27). It is a strategic move which may be implemented with something less than a full commitment on the part of the coercer, because if the strategy does not work, the coercer is not committed, internally, to pursue the strategy.
The second variant of the coercive diplomacy strategy, the strong variant, is called a "tacit ultimatum" approach (George, Hall,
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Hall Simons, Communist Party, Israelis Nietzschest, El Salvador, Liberation Organization, Unknown Foreign, Spanish German, Leaders Status, Huntington Nelson, WARFARE CONCEPT, foreign defeat, guerrilla warfare, unknown foreign, table continued, domestic defeat, communist party, pavolwitch 1971, unknown foreign defeat, foreign victory, coercive diplomacy, guerrilla leaders, dates insurgents incumbents, outcomes locales guerrilla, incumbents outcomes locales, insurgents incumbents outcomes,
Approximate Word count = 7267
Approximate Pages = 29 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Guerrilla Warfare
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
