Metropolitan Area Employment Patterns
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Sassen Koob correctly identifies changes that occurred in the context of metropolitan area employment patterns in the United States during the 1980s. Sassen Koob incorrectly attributed such changes to an economic evolution within the context of the free market concept. To read Sassen Koob's assessment, one would conclude that manufacturing is a disappearing phenomenon and that the "production and export of advanced services" is now the essence of economic structure and purpose. Applying the above assumptions, it is a relatively easy leap of faith for Sassen Koob to conclude that Los Angeles is the prototype of the new economy, while New York is dying because it is tied too strongly to the old economy.There are three major flaws in the Sassen Koob argument. First, Sassen Koob essentially restricted her analysis to event occurring in the American economy, while acknowledging that economics is now essentially global but ignoring international economic developments. Second, Sassen Koob failed to address the critical reason underlying the decline of traditional manufacturing in the United States New York, Los Angeles, or anywhere else. Third, Sassen Koob relied primarily on data reflecting the events in a single decade for conclusions applicable to a far longer period. Manufacturing has not declined in the global context, nor has the consumption of manufactured goods declined in the United States. Manufacturing has declined in the United States be
. . .
particularly American control and exploitation. The United States has thus far been required to pay a high price in the free trade negotiations for a quite limited access to Mexican energy resources. The price that the United States negotiators have agreed to will, if the agreement is ratified in its current form, result in a further decline in the American traditional manufacturing sector. Unfortunately for the Sassen Koob argument and for the American economy, there will not be an advanced services production and export offset at the required level.
Ellwood Question
Ellwood was concerned with the effects of spatial mismatches on the availability of jobs for teenagers in urban ghettos. The conventional argument in this context holds that, as affluent residents and business firms relocated from the central city to the suburbs, the low skilled jobs that urban teenagers could perform are relocated also, with the outcome that the spatial separation of ghetto teenagers and low skilled jobs results in high teenaged unemployment in the ghettos.
Location theory attempts to explain and predict the locational decisions of firms, and the spatial patterns of industry and agriculture which are the products of the aggregate locatio
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Hispanics Chicago, Question Ellwood, United Nations, Bush Administration, Los Angeles, Bush Administrations, Question Sassen Koob, Castells Portes, Tariff Trade, Trade Agreement, location theory, human capital, free trade, american economy, residential location, ghetto teenagers, willing pay, employer willing pay, bush administration, los angeles, ellwood analysis, free trade agreement, residential location theory, rate ghetto teenagers, theory residential location,
Approximate Word count = 3097
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Metropolitan Area Employment Patterns
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
