Most-favored-nations Trade Status with China
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The issue of the most-favored-nations (MFN) trade status for China has been argued heatedly at least since the Tiananmen Square incident in 1989, with a conflict between those who believe that the only way to change China is to continue trading with her against those who feel that such egregious conduct should not be "rewarded" by favorable treatment. This year, in spite of opposition to the continuation of MFN status for China, President Clinton renewed it, subject to certain changes within China as well as certain proofs that China is not breaking international agreements on the use of prison labor and other matters. The issue remains a strong point of contention, and whatever China does is scrutinized by both sides to see if she is living up to her agreements or in some way abrogating them and thus endangering MFN status in the future.MFN status entitles a country to economic preferences granted by the U.S. only to its best trading partners. Goods from countries on the MFN list are allowed into the United States at the lowest possible import tax, for instance, making the goods more attractive to U.S. consumers. The Chinese view winning MFN status as very important. China is one of the United States' major trading partners, selling the U.S. some $19 billion worth of goods each year, and the U.S. in turn sells China more than $6 billion worth of products each year. It is the President who decides which nations will receive MFN status. President Bush granted the stat
. . .
ll have a government independent in all matters except defense and foreign affairs. To allay investor uncertainty further, the Hong Kong government is trying to negotiate bilateral investment treaties with a number of important foreign investing countries, an effort approved by both the British and Chinese governments, both of which will have to agree to any such treaties. The United States has agreed to an initial bilateral investment treaty negotiating session that began in November 1991 (Gadzinski, 1991: p. 13).
U.S. investors with holdings in China have already had to wrestle with the human rights issues involved and have often done so by finessing the matter. Some companies have abandoned the fight--Levi Strauss & Co. announced this year that it would make its clothes elsewhere because of the "pervasive violation of human rights" in China. This particular defection will have little effect on China, but a wholesale defection would. By the same token, the continuing of U.S. investment in China bolsters the Chinese economy. Proponents of MFN say this is all to the good and will lead to change in time; opponents say it is the problem and that the Chinese system should not be bolstered until it changes its view of human rig
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Hong Kong, President Clinton, President Bush's, President Bush, Chinese American, Criticism Chinese, Tiananmen Square, Watch China, MFN Congress, British Chinese, hong kong, human rights, mfn status, status china, mfn status china, tiananmen square, business community, constructive engagement, president bush, people's republic, republic china, people's republic china, status china president, china president clinton, hong kong government,
Approximate Word count = 2700
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Most-favored-nations Trade Status with China
|