Office of the Future & Care Services
This is an excerpt from the paper...
CHILD DAY CARE, ELDER CARE, AND THEOFFICE OF THE FUTUREThis research examines the implications for the office of the future of child day care and elder care requirements. In this examination, the problem is described, responses and suggested responses to the problem are explained, and the implications for the office of the future are discussed. The need for child day care and the need for elder care stem from two separate problems. The responsibility for addressing each of the problems, however, most often falls to the same group of peoplepersons employed outside of the home. Thus, responses to each of the problems hold implications for employersfor the office. The average life span in the United States increased from an expected 70 years in 1960 to 79 years in the late1980s (Bureau of the Census, 1991). The expected life span for women is greater than that for men. Additionally, the expected life span applied to individuals born in the year for which the statistic is determinednot for those individuals already in their elderly years. A similar life expectancy increase, however, developed with respect to all age groups in the American population. Between 1970 and 1990, that segment of the population aged 65 years old or older increased more than twice the rate of general population growth. While the 65 and over group is the fastest growing segment of the American population, the 75 and over group is the fastest growing segme
. . .
ese arguments is the neglect that stems from an inability to adequately provide for one's children, if one does not or cannot work outside of the home (Belsky, 1990). Low and middle income parents of preschool age children, and adults heading singleparent families face a real dilemma with respect to child day care. They cannot afford it, and, yet, they cannot afford to be without it (Hewlett, 1990).
Responses to the Care Problem
In 1990, 47 percent of child day care not provided by parents in the family home is provided by other persons outside of an institutional setting (Wash and Brand, 1990). Other family members provide most of this care (31.7 percent), while the remainder (15.3 percent) is provided by unrelated persons (Wash and Brand, 1990). Institutional day care centers care for 11.5 percent of the children, while parents care for 6.1 percent of the children at the work place, and 35.4 percent of the children are required to provide selfcare (Wash and Brand, 1990).
Most major companies have recognized the significance of the problem. They also realize that adequate day care for the children of employees must be made available at affordable prices, if they are to attain maximum productivity from their employees
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Wash Brand, OFFICE FUTURE, Bureau Census, THEOFFICE FUTURE, Republic Germany, Children Major, Modern Society, day care, child day, child day care, Responses Care, REFERENCES Belsky, care services, elder care, day care services, fourday week, day care elder, care elder, office future, outside home, care elder care, Department Commerce, brand 1990, wash brand 1990, wash brand,
Approximate Word count = 1902
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Office of the Future & Care Services
|