Organizational Performance Appraisal Process
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The contemporary business environment in the United States and the business environment that will soon begin to emerge as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) begins to be implemented demand that American business firms, if they are to survive, improve the level of their performance. The key to improving organizational performance is the performance of the firm's employees as both individuals and as team workers. This study investigated one factor that affects the level of employee performancethe organizational performance appraisal process.Statement of the Problem Performance evaluation is among the most important of all organizational human resource activities Performance evaluations "represent critical decisions that are key influences on a variety of subsequent human resources actions and outcomes." Personnel turnover is one factor that leads to substandard performance, and it is one of the most costly problems that afflict organizations. The costs of personnel turnover are not limited to those incurred directly in relation to those employees leaving the organization, such as the loss of productive workers, lost training costs, the necessity to train replacements, and so forth. Personnel turnover also exacts organizational costs through the effects it has on those employees who remain with the organization. Ineffective performance evaluation is a contributing factor to high levels of personnel turnover. Performance appraisals build a history
. . .
individuals with the background, understanding, and psychological techniques necessary to approach their responsibilities in ways which will preclude the development of job burnout. Second, the additional time devoted to formal educational preparation may provide individuals with both the skills and the status required to insure that they will not become lockedinto lower level positions within an organization. Job satisfaction levels increase as formal taskspecific training levels increase. The theoretical rationale underlying this hypothesis is based upon the learning process. In this context, learning is the process by which an individual is able to change her or his behavior in some constructive manner. Higher levels of taskspecific training enables an individual to perform more effectively, and, thus, to gain greater satisfaction from the act of work. Job satisfaction levels increase as relevant job experience levels increase. Higher levels of relevant job experience enables an individual to perform more effectively, and, thus, to gain greater satisfaction from the act of work.
Job satisfaction levels increase, as the level of professional skills increase. A 1987 study examined the relationship between levels
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Performance Appraisal, Statement Performance, Satisfaction Job, Research Design, Fredrick Herzberg, Arlene MacBride, Agreement NAFTA, Definition Terms, performance evaluation, LITERATURE Literature, job satisfaction, performance appraisal, Data Analysis, personnel performance, evaluation process, performance evaluations, personnel performance evaluation, performance appraisal process, employee performance, performance evaluation process, appraisal process, appraisal processes, contemporary performance, performance appraisal processes, job satisfaction job,
Approximate Word count = 3433
Approximate Pages = 14 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Organizational Performance Appraisal Process
|