Performance Evaulation & Performance
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The contemporary business environment in the United States and the business environment that will soon begin to emerge as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) begins to be implemented demand that American business firms, if they are to survive, improve the level of their performance. The key to improving organizational performance is the performance of the firm's employees as both individuals and as team workers. This study investigated one factor that affects the level of employee performancethe organizational performance appraisal process.Statement of the Problem Performance evaluation is among the most important of all organizational human resource activities Performance evaluations "represent critical decisions that are key influences on a variety of subsequent human resources actions and outcomes." Personnel turnover is one factor that leads to substandard performance, and it is one of the most costly problems that afflict organizations. The costs of personnel turnover are not limited to those incurred directly in relation to those employees leaving the organization, such as the loss of productive workers, lost training costs, the necessity to train replacements, and so forth. Personnel turnover also exacts organizational costs through the effects it has on those employees who remain with the organization. Ineffective performance evaluation is a contributing factor to high levels of personnel turnover.
. . .
able to all aspects of personnel performance evaluation; not just to resultsoriented facets of performance; and the concept is appropriate for all types of organizations. In order for a performance evaluation process to provide for accountability, it is necessary to insure that the process measures and evaluates those factors that are important to those to whom an organization is accountablethe stockholders in the case of private sector organizations, and the public in the case of public sector organizations. This point is of particular significance for those individuals within organizations who typically consider themselves to be the experts in their particular fields of endeavor. Often, such individuals tend to believe that it is their prerogative alone to establish the criteria for the evaluation of performance.
Thus, a really effective evaluation process for personnel performance within an organization would be (1) objective, (2) valid, (3) reliable, (4) relevant, and (5) equitable, and it (6) would provide for accountability. Gortner pointed out, however, that, in all too many instances, employees are evaluated on "their ability to get along with the supervisor." Another common problem in the performance evaluation
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Performance Appraisal, Statement Performance, Satisfaction Job, Research Design, Fredrick Herzberg, Arlene MacBride, Agreement NAFTA, Definition Terms, performance evaluation, LITERATURE Literature, job satisfaction, performance appraisal, Data Analysis, personnel performance, evaluation process, performance evaluations, personnel performance evaluation, performance evaluation process, appraisal process, performance appraisal process, employee performance, appraisal processes, contemporary performance, performance appraisal processes, job satisfaction job,
Approximate Word count = 5578
Approximate Pages = 22 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Performance Evaulation & Performance
|