Affirmative Action
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Affirmative Action remains an employment legislation protection system that is intended to redress the systemized discrimination faced by women and minorities in hiring practices in America. Originally, Affirmative Action arose because of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s desire to integrate society on educational, employment, and economic levels. It was John F. Kennedy who issued Executive Order 10925 to create the Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, a commission that evolved into our modern Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), but it was Lyndon Johnson who gathered 300 corporate CEOs together after signing the 1964 Civil Rights Act to “discuss integrating our nation’s workplaces, schools, and economic institutions” (Shelton 1).While Affirmative Action has gone a long way toward redressing the systemized discrimination against women and minorities that long existed in American society, president, American courts, corporation leaders, educational institutions, and federal and state contractors have been arguing over the merits of affirmative action ever since its creation. We now live in a time where the protective powers of affirmative action are being undermined by constant efforts to dismantle the program, along with racial and gender quotas imposed by federal mandate on contractors and other employees required to meet federal hiring regulations. Despite cries of reverse discrimination because of affirmative action
. . .
participation goals inflate project costs and hurts established firms that could use the work. Someone is getting a paycheck for doing nothing” (Fallis and Wilson 9).
While many contractors lodge similar complaints as the one above towards affirmative action, there are many others who continue to argue in favor of affirmative action as the one sure means of redressing employment discrimination against women, minorities and others like the handicapped. Many argue that more needs done even in light of the success of affirmative action when it comes to opening fair access to employment and education for women and minorities. The historical system constructed in America when it comes to employment and educational opportunities has favored white males. While these men may not be responsible for discrimination in the modern era, there is still an obligation upon them to evolve the system to one of fairness and equal opportunity for all individuals. Many who opposed affirmative action argue that it hurts white individuals because women or minorities are often hired or admitted to schools who are less qualified but are required in order to meet quotas or mandated diversity goals. However, the majority of literature on the issue put
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Affirmative Action, Fallis Wilson, President Clinton, African Americans, affirmative action, Minority Contractors, World Vol, Afro-American September, Rights Act, Blacks Government, women minorities, Lyndon Johnsons, educational opportunities, employment educational, employment educational opportunities, access employment, access employment educational, means redressing, reverse discrimination, equal access, action means redressing, affirmative action means, equal access employment, action means, employment opportunity,
Approximate Word count = 1211
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
|