Do Not Call List
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is currently dealing with a variety of issues that have a significant impact on the American public. Identity theft, Internet fraud, and the imbroglio over the National Do-Not-Call Registry are among its most significant challenges. Identity theft has become the most common form of fraud committed over the Internet. Internet fraud is perpetrated in a variety of ways, from auction fraud on sites like E-bay to more traditional forms of theft committed electronically like pyramid schemes. One of the most recent political and legal battles being wages by the FCC is the National Do-Not-Call Registry. Millions of consumers, more than 50 million to be exact, have registered with the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) National Do-Not-Call Registry. The Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission and the states are responsible for enforcing the National Do-Not-Call Registry that originally went into effect on October 1, 2003 (National 2003). The Registry was created by the Federal Government as state governments created their own do-not-call registries, to enable citizens to take control of telemarketing solicitations. Consumers who registered to have their numbers put on the list were to see a stop in most kinds of telemarketing calls. The National Do-Not-Call Registry created a maelstrom of controversy when announced. Not only telemarketers but ot
. . .
the FTC to block the Do-Not-Call registry. It was two months later when U.S. District Judge Lee R. West ruled that the FTC “lacks authority to run the registry” (Chronology 2003, 1). Congress them passed legislation to clarify FTC authority as the FCC was being sued to block its Do-Not-Call rules. Judge Edward W. Nottingham blocked the FTC and FCC from enforcing the list and rules as “unconstitutional” on “free-speech grounds” (Chronology 2003, 1). However, a three-judge panel of the Denver 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied telemarketer requests to block the FCC’s Do-Not-Call rules. This caused the FCC to announce it would take over “all list enforcement” since the FTC was prohibited from acting (Chronology 2003, 1). In this scenario we see how the government (Congress) working in the name of consumers’ rights aligns its forces with agencies like the FTC and FCC to gain power in the judicial arena and against corporate America.
On November 10, 2003, an appeals court will decide the outcome of the charges against the FTC. Until them, however, the FCC has been enforcing the Do-Not-Call list which went into effect on October 1, 2003. However, until October 9, 2003, the FTC was blocked from reopening legislation for
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
FTC FCC, Do-Not-Call Registry, Registry Stein, FCC Web, Michael Powell, FCCs Do-Not-Call, Lee West, Internet Internet, Federal Government, USA Oct, do-not-call registry, do-not-call list, 2003 1, national do-not-call, ftc fcc, national do-not-call registry, 1 2003, communications commission, do-not-call rules, federal communications, federal communications commission, chronology 2003 1, chronology 2003, oct 1 2003, chairman michael powell,
Approximate Word count = 1357
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Do Not Call List
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
