Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Racial Equality In The Workplace

This is an excerpt from the paper...

The article under analysis herein is Beyond Good Intentions: The Next Steps Toward Racial Equality In The American Workplace, by Arthur Brief, Robert Buttram, Robin Reizenstein, Douglas Pugh; et al. In this article the authors discuss racism in the American workplace, both in terms of progress and the need for additional steps to eliminate a new form of racism that exists. Based on a literature review and a research study simulating the workplace, the authors contend that while blatant racism has largely been eliminated from the American workplace, a more pernicious and subtle form of racism the authors call new racism is alive and well (Brief et al. 60). This document will include a summary of the authors’ argument, an analysis of their argument, and a critical evaluation of that argument.

The authors begin their argument by admitting we have made progress against racism in the American workplace, particularly blatant racism. The authors review the literature and survey polls to affirm progress against blatant racism in the workplace (racial slurs, derogatory remarks, and blatantly racist actions). As Brief (et al. 59) note, “Just 50 years ago, public opinion polls showed widespread acceptance of segregation and discrimination based upon race; today, these polls demonstrate that blatant racist attitudes are no longer popular and racist expressions are socially unacceptable.” Despite

. . .
gal concerns, and ethical issues” (Brief et al. 62). In these studies the subjects were randomly assigned either to receive or not to receive business justifications to discriminate. These justifications came from their “boss” and were designed to mirror new racism justifications in the real workplace. For example, one reads: “Given that the vast majority of our work force is white, it is essential we put a white person in the VP position. I don’t want to jeopardize the fine relationship we have with out people in the units. Betty worked long and hard to get these folks to trust us; and I do not want her replacement to have to overcome any personal barriers” (Brief et al. 62). We can see how justifications are used to cloak racist attitudes in the new racism in action. The results of this studied demonstrated that those subjects who received such justifications rated black candidates lower on a five-point scale and selected significantly fewer qualified black candidates to be interviewed. The authors use their review of the literature and their simulated study to argue that more steps are needed to make racial equality a reality in the American workplace. The good intentions of executives up to this point have been resp
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Opportunity Commission, Herbert Simon, MALES Brief, Stanley Milgram, Browne Keeley, ARGUMENT SUMMARY, Douglas Pugh, Civil Rights, Critical Thinking, american workplace, ARGUMENT ANALYSIS, et al, brief et, brief et al, blatant racism, racist attitudes, racism authors, racial equality, racial inequality, al 60, authors argue, et al 60, racism american workplace, al 60 authors, steps racial equality,
Approximate Word count = 2026
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$