Case Analysis Public Disputes
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Of all public land use issues, including deforestation and habitat destruction, the most controversial one and the one most at an impasse is the siting of low-level RAD waste repositories. There are few people informed of the need for low-level RAD waste repositories who actively oppose the idea of siting them. However, in reality, nobody desires a low-level RAD waste repository in his or her own community (the not-in-my-back-yard or NIMBY syndrome). Merely the mention of the word radioactive sends shudders down the spines of most people, while also generating a great deal of opposition to the location of low-level RAD waste repositories. Relatively a new need for public land use, radioactive repositories find little if any support among the general public. People are unsure of the possible hazards they create, they worry about human error or terrorist acts creating additional terrors, and they often think that the lengthy time (500 years) until the repositories present no harm to humans or the environment is too great for any kind of responsible management with regard to safety and environmental concerns. Because of this, those who are responsible for locating and constructing the sites often go through a torturous ordeal in trying to build a consensus among the public in favor of low-level radioactive waste facilities. This analysis will examine the CNSI’s efforts to build such a public consensus in their a
. . .
e project. These risks included health and safety risks and disadvantages, long-term management ones, community development ones, and politically controversial ones.
CNSI outlines the four steps that most communities go through as the process that begins with information and ends with approval or disapproval of site location. The information stage provides necessary information to stakeholder representatives, allowing for a feasibility decision to be made. The interest stage is a tentative stage where a community admits to interest in opening dialogue and discussing the possibility of locating a site. The negotiation stage comes next and involves the formation of a Community Partnering agreement between CNSI and the community or municipality. This agreement is submitted to residents for approval. During the final approval stage, two decision must be made. The municipality must decided if it wants to host the site and the residents must approve their decision. Once this is done the municipality and the CNSI enter a legally binding contract to construct, operate and maintain the site.
CNSI has also been sensitive to the needs of stakeholders who are in some kind of proximity to the site location or on the transportatio
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Susskind Cruikshank, Analysis INTRODUCTION, Pennsylvania HISTORY/ANALYSIS, Despite CNSI, LLRW Strict, Community Partnering, Laws Susskind, RESOLUTIONS CNSI, rad waste, public land, site location, low-level rad waste, low-level rad, Review December, building consensus, Univ Press, radioactive waste, rad waste repositories, build consensus, siting process, public issues, waste facility, radioactive waste facility, low-level radioactive waste, site low-level radioactive,
Approximate Word count = 1888
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Case Analysis Public Disputes
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
