Group Interventions of Chemically Dependent Men

McVinney, L. D. & Hamid, A. (2002). Substance using men with HIV concerns: An integrated group approach from a harm reduction perspective. Social Work With Groups, 25(3), 1-11.

This paper presents a brief analysis of the foregoing article. The analysis evaluates and critiques the authors, the research hypotheses, the methods used to collect and analyze data, the nature of the findings, the general value of the article and its relevance to the field of social work.

This article by Donald McVinney and Andrew Hamid (2002) focuses on group interventions for chemically dependent men concerned about HIV. The credentials of both authors are mentioned in the article, establishing them as knowledgeable in the field.

This article is not an experimental study. Rather, it is a comprehensive review of the literature on the various barriers, problems, and difficulties that social workers can expect to face when implementing interventions for substance using men with HIV concerns. What this means is that no hypotheses were formulated. No sample was used, and so forth. However, what was needed to give the article more organization and make it easier to follow was a statement of its general purpose. This was provided as the first sentence of a brief abstract; however, it was NOT re-stated as part of the general introduction to the paper. The purpose stateme

. . .
e county jail located in the south would be more effectively processed if the psychoeducational intervention also addressed inmates' emotional concerns. The hypothesis was well-grounded in the existing research and was derived from a discussion of over 23 related studies. It was clearly stated at the conceptual or abstract level; however, this statement lacked technical specificity regarding such things as operational definitions and measurements, e.g., how is the term "processed" operationally defined? What type or nature of emotional concerns do the authors mean and how will they measure them? While the methodology section did provide this information, it would have been helpful if this was briefly addressed in the specification of the hypothesis as it would have directly tied predictions to data gathering methods and made it coherent not only from a conceptual but also a technical standpoint. Methodology One of the qualities of good research is that its data gathering methods are explained in sufficient detail so that the study is easily replicable (Gall, Borg & Gall, 2002) ). This section certainly fulfills this requirement in that data gathering techniques are presented in a comprehensive and detailed discussion. Problemat
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Andrew Hamid, Borg Gall, Education Prevention, Kiam Green, McVinney Hamid, Field Social, Relevance Field, Linton Gallo, ANOVA MANCOVA, Gallo Jr, service providers, psychoeducational intervention, gall borg gall, relevance field, field social, gall borg, outcome measures, borg gall, data gathering, confidence placed, literature review, value relevance field, relevance field social, borg gall 2002, data gathering methods,
Approximate Word count = 2019
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)