Alaska
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Although it was first discovered in 1799, Alaska was not officially admitted into the union as a state until 1959. Up until that time, Alaska's history had been littered with settlers from all over the world who found opportunity in the harsh climate of the land, during the gold rush, when oil was first discovered, and even now in its thriving fishing industry. Alaska's shores were also the sight of a sustained attack by Japanese forces during World War II that took two years to beat back (ExploreNorth 2001). Now, Alaska is also known for its wildlife, massive spaces, the pioneering and independent attitudes of its residents, as well as the brutality of its seasons. Indeed, Alaska has been called the last frontier of the United States. Currently, however, Alaska finds itself in the middle of a hotly debated issue over whether or not to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). The ANWR, at first 8.9 million acres of federally protected mountains and coastal plain in northeastern Alaska, was first set aside in 1957 by Secretary of the Interior, Fred B. Seaton, during the Eisenhower Administration (Issue in Detail 2001). At the same time, Seaton set aside 20 million acres of the North Slope of Alaska for commercial oil and gas leasing (2001). From that point to this, periodically the subject of opening up the refuge for oil drilling has been brought up. With an approval of 240 to 189 in the House, and a debate, threatening to be a fi
. . .
sought is significant, up to 10.3 billion barrels of oil could be recovered. This could displace the imports of oil from Saudi Arabia for up to 20 years and reduce reliance on the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) by about 1 million barrels a day and thus drive down the price of fuel for the next 30 years (Langenkamp B15). Consequently, for proponents of oil drilling in the ANWR, this significant addition to our nation's energy resources, combined with the jobs that would be created in a recession economy, the low impact that exploration would have on the environment, and the strong support of residents in the area are all compelling reasons for drilling to take place in the 1002 Area.
Why Limited Drilling Should Not Be Allowed
There are, of course, those who are opposed to oil and gas exploration in the ANWR. These critics contend that the promised jobs are a mere fraction of the given estimate, and are temporary at that, the oil that would be recovered would be an insignificant amount, and that there would indeed be a huge impact on the delicate balance of the environment in that area.
According to the Boston Globe, the study the Teamsters used in their estimate of created labor was commissioned by th
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Lovins Lovins, Issue Detail, Slope Alaska, Allowed Proponents, Sununu A101, , Langenkamp B15, Hood Teamsters, Global Energy, Knowles D-Alaska, oil gas, issue detail, issue detail 2001, detail 2001, arctic national wildlife, oil drilling, lovins lovins, jobs created, langenkamp b15, arctic national, wildlife refuge, national wildlife refuge, national wildlife, oil gas exploration, 2001 available online,
Approximate Word count = 2293
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Alaska
|