Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

A Defense of Abortion: A Critique

This is an excerpt from the paper...

In her essay titled "A Defense of Abortion," Judith Jarvis Thomson grants abortion opponents' argument that a fetus is a person from the moment of conception. She then supposes that abortion opponents' arrive at the conclusion that abortion is morally wrong because the fetus's right to life supercedes the mother's desire to decide what happens with her body (1971, p. 241). To test this premise - that the right to life supercedes the right to control one's body - Thomson offers the example of the dying violinist. A person wakes one day to find themselves hooked up to a dying violinist. The violinist's kidneys are failing and, without the 'donor's' express consent, the Society of Music Lovers has plugged the violhnist's kidneys into the donor's kidneys. The donor must remain hooked up to the violinist for at least nine months to save the violinist's life (Thomson, 1971, p. 241).

Thomson notes immediately that one problem with her dying violinist case is that the donor was hooked up without his or her consent. But she also notes that many abortion opponents oppose abortion even in cases of rape. Thus, she contends that her example does not fail due to the lack of the donor's consent. But is there a difference between becoming pregnant due to a rape and becoming pregnant by artificial insemination while in a coma? The latter situation seems closer to Thomson's example than a rape. Specifically, the donor in the violinist case is more like a w

. . .
and Jones and the coat. Jones has found a coat to keep from freezing, but Smith, who owns the coat, also needs it to keep from freezing. Thomson argues that Smith clearly has a superior right to claim how the coat will be used, and that third parties (meaning doctors and medical professionals) should recognize this superior right (1971, pp. 243-244). Thomson then dismisses the argument that the woman does not have the rifht to control her body because her body is "on loan" to her. But what about the argument that a woman does not have the right to perform an abortion because woman's bodies are made specifically to bear children - to nurture fetuses - and to perform an abortion would be to violate this fundamental, natural law? This argument seems more in line with abortion opponents' contention that abortions are impermissible because they violate nature, while Thomson's argument of Smith and Jones and the coat seems more of a legal argument - over property rights - that does not really seem to respond to the abortion opponents. Thomson argues that the right to life "consists not in the right not to be killed, but rather in the right not to be killed unjustly" (1971, p. 245). Thus, she considers whether abortion could be an unjus
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Music Lovers, Price Sex, Smith Jones, Samaritans Thomson, Decent Samaritan, Jarvis Thomson, control body, abortion opponents, fetus's life, mother's control body, mother's control, thomson argues, fetus person, Reference Thomson, abortion opponents', dying violinist, Defense Abortion', perform abortion, Public Affairs, Decent Samaritans, abortion depends mother's, depends mother's, abortion opponents oppose, depends mother's control, opponents oppose abortion,
Approximate Word count = 1713
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$