Children Coping With Surgery
This is an excerpt from the paper...
I. Critique of Problem Statement. The area of research studied in this paper is how children cope with minor and major surgery (LaMontagne, Hepworth and Cohen, 2000, 245-252). Factors which affect coping have been identified previously - locus of control, parent-doctor information, and worry - but it is not known whether the type of surgery per se affects the coping strategies used, whether it influences these strategies, and whether it has any effect on predictors of coping in children about to undergo surgery. This study also looked at the relationship between type of surgery, attention focus, and coping. To date, no study has examined both major and minor surgery together in the same study of children's coping strategies. The researchers set out to determine the differential effects on coping of minor vs. major surgery and whether coping can be predicted better if the attention focus of the child is known. The research may provide some further insights on children's reactions to surgery which may influence how nurses handle these children. The purpose of the study is clearly stated in the introductory portion of the paper.II. Critique of Literature Review. The literature review is not extensive, but this may not be an extensively covered subject. It also does not contain any recent references, the latest being from 1997, and 1996 by the same authors, and most of the others being from the 1970s and 1980s (LaMontagne, Hepworth and Cohen, 2000, 245-252). The arti
. . .
ren, the Parent-Doctor Information Interview, the Family Information Questionnaire, Two-Factor Index of Social Position, and an assessment of worrying in the children. The study is internally valid in so far as these questionnaires are valid, and are answered truthfully, and as far as the interviews were able to elicit truthful answers from the children. The study design does not call for the drawing of causal inferences between study variables. The study is externally valid because it confirmed the data of earlier studies. The limitations of the study are that only a small number of subjects were used; only a limited sampling area if the United States was used; and the average age of the children used was 12.60 + 2.63 years of age (range 8 to 18 years), whereas inclusion of younger children may have been helpful. The authors admit that the sample used was a convenience sample, but do not mention any limitations on the study when interpreting the results.
VI. Critique of Sampling Plan. The sample used was a convenience sample (LaMontagne, Hepworth and Cohen, 2000, 245-253). No other indication is given of why the particular locations used were chosen. These locations are not particularly representative of the U
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Hepworth Cohen, Social Position, Interview Worry, Research Design, Ethical Dimensions, Literature Review, Scale Children, Avoidant-Vigilant Dimension, cohen 2000, hepworth cohen, hepworth cohen 2000, Critique Measurement, lamontagne hepworth, Critique Statement, lamontagne hepworth cohen, cohen 2000 245-252, 2000 245-252, attention focus, minor major, major surgery, children undergoing, minor major surgery, type surgery, children undergoing minor, undergoing minor,
Approximate Word count = 1802
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Children Coping With Surgery
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
