Female Teachers and Nonverbal Cues

b. The independent variable in the study is the gender of the teacher (i.e., female vs. male). The dependent variable in the study is students' perception of teacher sensitivity to nonverbal communication cues. Subsumed within the dependent variable are nonverbal communication cues and the construct of sensitivity, which is generally attributed to women far more than to men (Aguinis & Henle, 2001).

c. The independent variable of gender will be defined by a simple coding strategy using the number 1 to represent the male teachers and the number 2 to represent the female teacher. The dependent variable of students' perceptions of teacher sensitivity to nonverbal communication cues will be nominally defined by students' responses to an instrument developed by the researcher.

II. Research Method 1a. The experimental design used to test the hypothesis will consist of a classical pre-test/post-test design with two experimental conditions labeled "A" and "B." The "A" condition will consist of st

. . .
s. They will be asked to use one of several nonverbal communication cues (e.g., yawning, looking away, playing with hair, fiddling with pens and books, and so forth) during the lecture, and to use a survey instrument developed by the researcher to record any and all responses from teachers to these cues. Teachers will not be informed that they are being presented with such cues, but will instead simply be permitted to react as they would to such cues in a non-experimental setting. All groups will be monitored by the researcher during the presentations to ensure that students are using the scorecard survey instrument. 1d. By creating a setting in which two teachers, one male and one female, are actively engaged in pedagogical performances that require interaction with a group of students, the experimental conditions will be created. The independent variable - teacher sensitivity to nonverbal cues - will automatically be induced by the presentation of such cues in a setting typical of teacher/student interaction in the classroom. 1e. The dependent variable of student perceptions of teacher sensitivity to nonverbal communication cues will be measured by a simple recording device. A pen and paper scorecard will
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Research Method, Aguinis Henle, III Summary, Marche Peterson, Hypothesis Measurement, nonverbal communication, nonverbal communication cues, Journal Research, communication cues, nonverbal cues, sensitivity nonverbal, Social Psychology, teacher sensitivity, dependent variable, teacher sensitivity nonverbal, sensitivity nonverbal communication, randomly selected, Research December, sensitivity nonverbal cues, independent variable, students randomly, female teacher, instrument developed researcher,
Approximate Word count = 1340
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Female Teachers and Nonverbal Cues