History as Narrative
This is an excerpt from the paper...
History is indeed a series of stories. If none of them is true in some sort of Newtonian way (in the same way that gravity is "true" or that centrifugal force is "true") then they are true in a sort of Einsteinian way. These stories are relative, so that they shift with the position of the speaker, but this does not mean that they are not true. History is located in all of those different positions, all of the different perspectives of an event. It is the collection of all of the memories of those who were present - as witnesses or as participants - to a set of events. But history is more than memory, as Alfred Young demonstrates in his The Shoemaker and the Tea Party : Memory and the American Revolution (2000), for it is also a tool of instruction a way in which we not only hold on to the past but consciously use that past to shape the present and the future. It is as much a series of instructions for the future as it is a map of the past.Young's book demonstrates the ways in which memory is translated into history by using the memories of one man and examining the ways in which those memories were honed to serve the needs of an emerging nation, and the ways in which they are still used to meet the needs of each new generation of Americans as they try to understand what it means to be an American, what it means to live in a country with one particular past and not some other past. The book focuses on the events of December 16, 1773, when a group of about 150 white men dis
. . .
y and most of those who had actually made history had died, the nation began to shore up the memories of those days.
Those who were at Lexington or at Griffin's Harbor could have no sense of how important their actions would be. They hoped to make a difference, but history is the connected stories of those actions that did make a difference, not simply those actions that people hoped would be effective. Memory includes that sense of having done the best that one can while history gives little regard to failed efforts.
History, in its broadest sense, is the totality of all past events, although a more realistic definition would limit it to the known past. Young, by focusing on the ways in which memories over time are collected, compared, winnowed and woven in history is engaging in historiography, which is the examination of the process of history-making. In seeking the understand how particular events that occurred during the American Revolution became ongoing touchstones for our sense of who we are as a people, Young is writing both history and historiography.
Of all the fields of serious study and literary effort, history may be the hardest to define precisely, because the attempt to uncover past events and formulate an inte
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
American Revolution, Tea Party, Griffin's Harbor, , Neil Armstrong, Twelves Hewes, Griffin's Wharf, american revolution, Boston Harbor, tea party, George Hewes, boston tea, boston tea party, Boston Tea, sense importance, memory american revolution, past serves, importance doing, past past, sense importance doing, memory american, importance doing act, shoemaker tea, party memory american, party memory,
Approximate Word count = 1239
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
More Essays on History as Narrative
|