George Berkeley
This is an excerpt from the paper...
There is something tantalizing about imagining the august George Berkeley sitting at his desk with a pineapple before him, communicating about the ways in which we may know and not know aspects of the world around us. And yet, even as we begin to savor this mental image - even as Berkeley is not, in that image, savoring that pineapple - we realize that Berkeley, with his dismissal of the reality of the world, will never believe that he can know what that pineapple actually tastes like. Why that should be - and the ways in which it matters and does not matter - is the subject of this paper.To come to an understanding of the relationship between Mr. Berkeley and the sample of Ananas comosus that we have placed for him on his desk, we may begin with what might appear to be a straw-philosopher argument. But, in making a nod to Rene Descartes and his Meditations we shall create a firmer basis for analyzing Berkeley's understanding of understanding. Descartes created a foundation in his own work on the nature of knowledge and the dueling powers of human certainty and doubt to which Berkeley - who was born in 1685, 35 years after Descartes's death - would build. Berkeley's work must be seen as in some measure a response, or a rejoinder, to the work that Descartes had done, for no philosopher writing within at least the century after Descartes's death on the relationship between reality, human experience and human perception could fail to engage the ideas of Descartes - or at leas
. . .
o be sensible of and to understanding the way in which his mind function proves the objective existence of that mind and indeed of all of the rest of the physical world. This chain of argumentation is known as the ontological argument, and Berkeley rejects it out of hand. Descartes believes that it is possible to know about external world purely on the basis of the internal workings of the mind.
Thus Descartes, looking down at his own pineapple, would argue that our experience of the pineapple's taste and texture and scent - coupled with his ontological proof of the reality of the world - is sufficient for us to understand, appreciate, and know how a pineapple tastes. Berkeley, watching Descartes roll the heavy, awkward fruit around the perimeter of his Cartesian Circle, would argue that Descartes (and in large measure John Locke) is confusing and confounding ideas and facts. Locke, for example, argued that all information about objective reality enters human consciousness through the senses, and from our sense organs is limned upon the tabulae rasae of our minds. The very blankness of those minds, countered against the highly organized state of our thoughts, means that ideas already exist in organized form. Thus Locke would sid
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
God God, Locke Hume, Descartes Meditations, Hume Locke, George Berkeley, John Locke, Berkeley Locke, Cartesian Circle, reality world, Fuller Gary, , admission existence perfect, idea perfection, sensory information, human knowledge, admission existence, locke believes, existence perfect, senses sense, information world, own pineapple,
Approximate Word count = 1298
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
More Essays on George Berkeley
|