Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Illegal Seizure

This is an excerpt from the paper...

The best argument in favor of suppressing the signaling device is that the officer recovered it as the result of an illegal "seizure" of Al in front of the museum. Since the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to seize Al at that point, all evidence obtained after that encounter is the "fruit of the poisonous tree" and inadmissible against Al. Regardless of how it was obtained, this evidence may be used against the other defendants, who do not have standing to challenge evidence seized from others, even if illegally obtained.

This stop constitutes a seizure according to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Terry v. Ohio (1968), which defined a seizure as occurring when an officer "has in some way restrained the liberty of a citizen." This restraint can be by physical force or by show of authority. Here, the officer approached Al in her police car. She directed her flashlight at him in a clear show of authority and she interrogated Al ("What's going on here?"). A reasonable person in Al's situation would have perceived that they were not free to leave, thus creating a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes.

For the signaling device to be admissible against Al, that seizure had to be lawful, which means Ann had to have a reasonable suspicion that Al was engaged in or had engaged in criminal activity. Merely standing on a street corner does not give rise to reasonable suspicion, as the Court held in Brown v. Texas (1979). In that case, the pol

. . .
be approved by detached magistrate. Since the police lacked such a warrant, the defense will argue that the evidence should not be admitted. Only George and John have standing to challenge this evidence, which can be admitted against any other defendant regardless of how obtained. Evidence seized in a warrantless search may still be admitted if one of the exceptions to the warrant requirement applies. The prosecutor will argue that the evidence is admissible an exception. The only exceptions that could apply are the "hot pursuit" exception and the "plain view" exception. The hot pursuit exception requires the police, before entering the premises, to have probable cause that the person they are pursuing committed a serious crime, that the person is present, and that the suspect will escape or evidence will be destroyed. The prosecutor will argue that they had probable cause because the occupants matched Ace's description, that the beeper led them to this area, and that the pursuit had been continuous from the moment Ann and Ace stumbled upon the crime. The plain view exception admits evidence that the police discover in the open while lawfully on the premises. Thus, the police had probable cause to believe the suspects
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Governor Ryan's, Al Ann, Al Regardless, Ann Ace, George John, Governor Ryan, Supreme Court, Detective Sharp's, Sharp I've, Miranda Arizona, capital punishment, death penalty, probable cause, probable cause search, cause search, miranda warnings, reasonable suspicion, prosecutor counter, prosecutor argue, evidence seized, plain view, fruit poisonous tree, criminal justice system, ann tackled al, al's statement ann,
Approximate Word count = 2717
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Illegal Seizure

Law Senarios 2123 words
Search ampamp Seizure 488 words
Search ampamp Seizure Law Case 3678 words
FOURTH AMENDMENT CASES Thi 2525 words
The Warren Court 2434 words
Civil Liberties and the Supreme Court 1438 words
United States v. Leon 8611 words
Letter on the Exclusionary Rule 1185 words
The Right to Privacy 1702 words
Court Cases 2501 words
Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW