Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Individual Rights and Responsibilites: Three Different Perspectives

This is an excerpt from the paper...

There are a multitude of views concerning how an individuals rights and responsibilities in a society should be conceived, advanced through the years by successive generations of political philosophers. In the twentieth century, there have been three main schools of thoughts about the individual and society: anarchistic, liberal, and communitarian. Anarchists believe that individuals should be utterly free from constraint by society, free to follow their consciences wherever they might take them. Liberals believe that individuals deserve certain rights and that it is society's job to protect them by enacting laws. Communitarians hew the middle ground by believe that linked social responsibility within a society allows individuals to be autonomous while respectful of others. I believe that none of these ideas has a monopoly on the truth. However, this paper will explore all three concepts of individualism and show why the liberal concept is closest to the truth.

Thoreau is considered by many to be the father of the anarchistic conception of individualism. This is not exactly an accurate portrayal of his point of view, however. In his most famous political work, the Treatise on Civil Disobedience, Thoreau vehemently defends the individual's right to conscientiously object to unjust laws. While this has been taken by many to be a direct appeal for anarchy, Thoreau was really advocating for a better governmentùnot no governmentùand for the individual's right to objec

. . .
which he called the state of nature. The state of nature was a state of anarchy, in which individuals could do what they wanted. However, this meant that nobody was safe because anybody stronger could come and take away their property or their life. The strong were also not safe, however, because the weak could gang up on them. Out the state of nature, then man created a political society based on the social contract based on an individual's consent to be governed by certain laws in exchange for the saftey of their property and life (Tuckness). In more recent times, liberal scholars such as Ronald Dworkin have pointed out that "We live in and by the law. It makes us what we are: citizens and employees and doctors and spouses and people who own things. It is sword, shield, and menace" (Dworkin, Preface). The law, in Dworkin's conception, is what keeps people in their designated role in society. It is what gives us the security that our wages will be paid, that our landlords will maintain our homes, and that serial killers cannot indiscriminately hunt us down without legal repercussions. I agree with the Liberal perspective up to a certain point. I believe that laws are necessary in order to maintain a stable society. I
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Bell Communitarians, Disobedience Thoreau, , Dworkin Preface, Contract Locke, Thomas Jefferson, Ronald Dworkin, Edward Zalta, Forthcoming URL, Philosophy Winter, stanford encyclopedia, url =, edition edward, 2005 edition, social contract, serial killers, 2005 edition edward, stanford encyclopedia philosophy, encyclopedia philosophy, communitarians believe, winter 2005 edition, edward zalta, edition edward zalta, zalta ed, philosophy winter 2005,
Approximate Word count = 1275
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2010 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW