Democracies and War
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The argument that "democracies do not fight each other" is defensible in a general context. One simply must bear in mind that exceptions tend to exist to almost any general argument. Further, the argument that "democracies do not fight each other" should not be extended to hold that democracies are less prone to engage in armed conflict than are other governments.In Power Kills, Rummel's essential thesis is that democratic societies tend to be less violent than non-democratic societies, and, thus, democratic societies are less likely than are non-democratic societies to be associated violent actions that result in the death of either their own citizens or the citizens of other countries. This thesis is predicated on an underlying argument that unrestrained, centralized power leads to an abuse of power that more often than not is manifested in violent actions in which peo
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Kills Rummel's, Naval Treaty, War Japan, , argument democracies fight, centralized power, University Press, Transaction Publishers, democracies fight, power kills, argument democracies, Democratic Peace, Power Kills, assumption democratic nation, unrestrained centralized, non-democratic societies, five assumptions, frequency war, democratic societies, unrestrained centralized power, democratic peace,
Approximate Word count = 593
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Democracies and War
|