ARBITRATION DECISIONS IN EMPLOYMENT TERMINATION

Arbitration (through the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925, subsequent federal labor-management legislation, and federal court rulings) is a prominent part of labor-management relations in the United States (Hayford, 2000; Feller, 1998). Among the more contentious cases committed to arbitration are those involving employee termination. Approximately 18 percent of all labor arbitration cases involve employee termination (Mesch & Shamayeva, 1996).

Among the many employee behaviors motivating termination actions by employers is on-the-job substance use or possession. For decades, on-the-job alcohol use or possession was the primary substance implicated in such cases. The growth in the use of illegal narcotics in recent years, however, created an environment of near parity between alcohol and narcotics as the basis for on-the-job substance use or possession employment termination cases (Gilman, 2001). Some social commentators charge that, because of the war on drugs, charges of using or possessing narcotics on-the-job are more likely than charges of on-the-job alcohol use or possession to result in employment termination (Miranda, 1998).

This study examined decisions in formal arbitration proceedings involving employment termination cases based on employee on-the-job alcohol or narcotics use or

. . .
tabulation chi-square analysis. The analyses tested null hypotheses for each of the variable relationships. The criterion for the rejection of the null hypotheses was a determination of statistical significance at p <.05. The statistical software used in the analyses was the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) application program. Findings of the Study The primary purpose of the study was to assess variations in arbitration decisions in employment termination cases based on substance use or possession charges in relation to the termination case-type (type of substance ? alcohol or narcotics ? constituting the basis for the charge). Table 1 presents the cross-tabulation of Termination Case-Type (independent variable) by Arbitration Decision (dependent variable). Table 1
The Pearson Chi-Square value was 5.570 (df = 1), which was statistically significant for an asymptotic two-sided chi-square test at p .018. The significance level of p .018 permitted the rejection of the null hypothesis. Therefore, it was possible to state that the arbitration decision varied to a statistically significant extent in relation to termination case-type. In this analysis, arbitrators upheld terminations based on alcohol us
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Treatment Treatment, Affairs BNA, Workplace Act, Purpose Study, Mesch Shamayeva, Confirmation Confirmation, Remedy Remedy, United Hayford, Arbitration Act, employment termination, termination case-type, classifications included database, included database follows, database follows, classifications included, included database, arbitration decisions, arbitration decision, substance possession, on-the-job alcohol, Drug-Free Workplace, arbitration decisions termination, relationship arbitration, decisions termination case-type, variable follows 1,
Approximate Word count = 2635
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)

More Essays on ARBITRATION DECISIONS IN EMPLOYMENT TERMINATION